Везде
Features of Criminal Procedural Evidence in the Context of Digitalization
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Features of Criminal Procedural Evidence in the Context of Digitalization
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/S160565900030639-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Zaytcev 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8706-903X
Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Chief Researcher, Center of Criminal and Criminal Procedure Legislation, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 Issue 8
Pages
93-112
Abstract

One of the important national development goals of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2030 is the achievement of digital transformation, which objectively led to the expansion of the use of electronic information in criminal procedural evidence, which, however, is accompanied by a number of theoretical, legal and law enforcement problems. In the theory of criminal procedure law, acute discussions continue on the fundamental problems of improving criminal procedure evidence in the context of the further development of modern digital platforms and various types of technologies. The purpose of the study is to develop scientifically sound and practically significant recommendations aimed at ensuring criminal procedural evidence in the context of digitalization. Research objectives: analysis of the impact of ongoing digitalization processes on the system of criminal procedure law, law-making and law enforcement activities related to evidence; identification of promising areas for the transformation of criminal procedure evidence, including the admissibility of obtaining evidence using artificial intelligence technologies. Research methodology: dialectical method of cognition, general scientific methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis, special legal methods (comparative legal, logical legal, etc.). Conclusion. Promising areas of transformation of criminal procedural evidence are: a) expanding the possibilities of accessing technological integrated platforms that facilitate obtaining the necessary data in the infrastructure of a single information space; b) changing existing ideas about the criminal procedure form, which contradicts modern methods of obtaining evidentiary information; c) the dynamic introduction of electronic document management in criminal proceedings; d) further legal regulation of the use of electronic evidence in proving the guilt (innocence) of a person in committing a criminal act, as well as other circumstances related to a criminal case; e) expanding the range of investigative actions that allow more productively obtaining evidentiary information in electronic format; f) specifying the competence and powers of subjects of criminal law procedural evidence. Conceptually, it is necessary to determine the limits of the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation and adoption of criminal procedural decisions and in proving facts in a criminal case).

Keywords
criminal proceedings, criminal procedural evidence, preliminary investigation, judicial proceedings, participants in criminal proceedings, digitalization, information and digital technologies, artificial intelligence
Date of publication
22.08.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1. 
2. Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_1_7. 
3. Chernogor N. N., Pashentsev D. A. (eds). Concept of digital state and digital legal environment. Moscow, 2021. 244 p. (In Russ.) 
4. Tikhomirov Yu. A., Nanba S. B. (eds). Legal Concept of Robotization. Moscow, 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.) 
5. Kovler A. I. Anthropology of Human Rights in the Digital Age (the Essay of the Comparative Legal Method). Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 5—29. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2022.125. 
6. Lazarev V. V. Legal Science in the Light of the Prospects of Digitalization. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 5—19. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.013. 
7. Tereshchenko L. K. (ed.). Human rights in information field in the context of digitalization. Moscow, 2023. 244 p. (In Russ.) 
8. Khabrieva T. Y. Contemporary Law-Making and the Role of Juridical Science. Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 8, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.) 
9. Pashentsev D. A. Russian Legislative Tradition before the Challenge of Digitalization. Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 2, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art_2019_2_1. 
10. Sinitsyn S. A. Russian and foreign civil law in the context of robotization and digitalization. Experience in interdisciplinary and industry research. Moscow, 2020. 212 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Tereshchenko L. K., Emelyanov A. S., Povetkina N. A. (eds). Digital Transformation and State Governmnet. Moscow, 2022. 224 p. (In Russ.) 
12. Truntsevsky Yu.V., Tsirin A. M., Cherepanova E. V. et al. Anti-corruption and Digitalization Processes. Moscow, 2023. 196 p. (In Russ.) 
13. Kucherov I. I., Sinitsyn S. A. (eds). Digital Economy: Current Directions of Legal Regulation. Moscow, 2022. 376 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Nudel S. L. Modernization of Criminal Policy: Problems of Legal Regulation. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5—22. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.001. 
15. Bessonov A. A. Problematic Issues of Establishing the Signs of an Organized Group for Crimes Committed Using Information and Telecommunication Technologies. Journal of Russian Law, 2024, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 108—119. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.61205/S160565900027800-4. 
16. Golovanova N. A., Gravina A. A., Zaycev O. A. et al. Jurisdictional lawful activities within the criminal law sphere framework in the context of digitalization. Moscow, 2019. 212 p. (In Russ.) 
17. Piyuk A. V. Rol' suda v dokazyvanii obstoyatel'stv ugolovnogo dela v sovremennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Moscow, 2020. 
18. Sheyfer S. A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya. Moscow, 2024. 
19. Konev D. A. Kriminologicheskaya bezopasnost' i ee obespechenie v sfere tsifrovykh tekhnologiy. Cand. diss. Omsk, 2022. 
20. Boyko O. A., Unukovich A. S. Determinants of latent crimes committed using information and communications technologies. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta, 2020, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 53—59. (In Russ.) 
21. Momotov V. V. The Space of Law and the Power of Technology in the Mirror of Judicial Practice: a modern view. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 112—123. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.021. 
22. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Means to Break Critical Situations, Which are Deforming Factors for a State's and the World Society's Development. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 13—15. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jflcl.2022.003. 
23. Andreeva O. I., Kachalova O. V. Russian criminal trial in the era of coronavirus: challenges of time. Tomsk State University Journal of Law, 2020, no. 36, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.) 
24. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Based Managing the Pandemic Crisis: World and Russian Experience. Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 5—17. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2021.015. 
25. Zaytsev O. A. Ensuring the Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Participants in Criminal Proceedings in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 91—108. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.119. 
26. Muratova N. G., Sergeev M. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie primeneniya elektronnoy informatsii i elektronnykh nositeley informatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: otechestvennyy i zarubezhnyy opyt. Moscow, 2019. 
27. Skobelin S. Yu. Ispol'zovanie tsifrovykh tekhnologiy pri dokazyvanii prestupnoy deyatel'nosti. Rossiyskiy sledovatel', 2019, no. 3. 
28. Maslennikova L. N. First results of the scientific project no. 18-29-16018 “The concept of forming up criminal proceedings providing access to justice in the conditions of digital technologies development”. Lex russica, 2020, no. 1, pp. 70—87. (In Russ.) 
29. Pobedkin A. V. Osnovnye polozheniya UPK Rossii kak sistema garantiy publichnosti ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Moscow, 2024. 
30. Golovko L. V. The digitalization in criminal procedure: local optimization or global revolution? Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti, 2019, no. 1, pp. 15—25. (In Russ.) 
31. Pobedkin A. V. Ethical and axiological risks of digitalization fashion for criminal proceedings (about the fallacy of the technological approach to the criminal process). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 50—55. (In Russ.) 
32. Muratova N. G. Ugolovnyy protsess: problemy i idei. Moscow, 2021. 
33. Voronin M. I. Electronic evidence in the criminal procedure code: to be or not to be? Lex russica, 2019, no. 7, pp. 74—84. (In Russ.) 
34. Zuev S. V. Electronic evidence in criminal proceedings: concept and significance. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, 2020, no. 3, pp. 46—51. (In Russ.) 
35. Kolichenko A. A. Electronic media as a source of obtaining electronic evidence in criminal proceedings. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 1, pp. 114— 121. (In Russ.) 
36. Vekhov V. B., Zuev S. V. (eds). Tsifrovaya kriminalistika. Moscow, 2023. 
37. Valov S. V. Poluchenie sledovatelem svedeniy iz informatsionnykh sistem operatorov sotovoy svyazi: pravovye i organizatsionno-tekhnologicheskie modeli. In: Sementsov V. A. (ed.). Aktual'nye problemy sudebnoy, pravookhranitel'noy, pravozashchitnoy, ugolovnoprotsessual'noy i antikorruptsionnoy deyatel'nosti: mater. Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Part 1. Krasnodar, 2024. 
38. Sheremet'ev I. I. Using digital technologies in criminal cases in court: reality and prospects. Lex russica, 2019, no. 5, pp. 117—131. (In Russ.) 
39. Bertovskiy L. V., Devyatkin G. S. Metavselennye i perspektivy vnedreniya tekhnologiy virtual'noy real'nosti v ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. Tsifrovye tekhnologii i pravo: sb. nauch. trudov II Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Kazan', 22 September 2023). Vol. 2. Kazan', 2023. 
40. Pastukhov P. S. Doktrinal'naya model' sovershenstvovaniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo dokazyvaniya v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva. Moscow, 2015. 
41. Zuev S. V. (ed.). Razvitie informatsionnykh tekhnologiy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. Moscow, 2018. 
42. Zuev S. V. (ed.). Osnovy teorii elektronnykh dokazatel'stv. Moscow, 2019. 
43. Zuev S. V. (ed.). Informatsionnye tekhnologii v ugolovnom protsesse zarubezhnykh stran. Moscow, 2020. 
44. Gladysheva O. V. Tsifrovizatsiya ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i problemy obespecheniya prav ego uchastnikov. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, no. 1. 
45. Aleksandrov A. S., Andreeva O. I., Zaytsev O. A. On development prospects of the Russian criminal proceeding in the context of digitalization. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2019, no. 448, pp. 199—207. (In Russ.) 
46. Malysheva O. A., Samsonov P. A. The Use of Information and Communication Technologies by the Investigator During Investigative Actions: Risks and Ways to Overcome. Journal of Russian Law, 2024, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 66—78. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.61205/jrp.2024.2.3. 
47. Bufetova M. Sh., Kobzar' D. N. Primenenie sistem video-konferents-svyazi v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: perspektiva izmeneniya zakonodatel'stva. Advokatskaya praktika, 2021, no. 2. 
48. Pobedkin A. V. Proizvodstvo sledstvennykh deystviy s ispol'zovaniem sistem videokonferents- svyazi na dosudebnom proizvodstve: ramochnost' protsessual'nykh garantiy. Vestnik Ufimskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2022, no. 1. 
49. Gavrilin Yu. V., Pobedkin A. V. Modernizatsiya ugolovno-protsessual'noy formy v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 3. 
50. Voskobitova L. A. Criminal justice and digital technology: compatibility issue. Lex russica, 2019, no. 5, pp. 91—104. (In Russ.) 
51. Stel'makh V. Yu. Elektronnaya informatsiya v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam: sposoby polucheniya i mesto v sisteme dokazatel'stv. Biblioteka kriminalista, 2018, no. 3. 
52. Nikuradze N. O. “Electronic Evidence” in Criminal P roceedings: On the Expediency of Legal Regulation. Journal of Russian Law, 2024, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 132—144. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.61205/S160565900028929-5. 
53. Zuev S. V., Zazulin A. I. Tsifrovoy UPK: novaya kontseptsiya razvitiya prava. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, 2024, no. 1. 
54. Muratov K. D., Muratova N. G. Processal and criminalistic model of application of artificial intelligence technologies when checking communications of crime in the case of transmission by the owner of funds and pictures and payment systems (scientific opinion on paragraph 5, part 1, article 4 of the Federal law of 04.24.2020 № 123-FZ). Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii, 2020, no. 2, pp. 98—102. (In Russ.) 
55. Zakirov R. F. The use of modern it-technologies as a mean to achieve the basic tasks of legal proceedings. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 1. (In Russ.) 
56. Smirnov A. V. Electronic evidence, electronic proving, artificial intelligence: what next?. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 2024, no. 1, pp. 24—31. (In Russ.) 
57. Zaytsev O. A., Pastukhov P. S. Digital personal profile as an element of the information and technological strategy of crime investigation. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2022, iss. 56, pp. 281—308. (In Russ.) 
58. Bessonov A. A. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i matematicheskaya statistika v kriminalisticheskom izuchenii prestupleniy. Moscow, 2021. 
59. Zaytsev O. A., Pastukhov P. S., Fadeeva M. Yu., Perekrestov V. N. Artificial Intelligence as a New IT Means of Solving and Investigating Crimes. “Smart Technologies” for Society, State and Economy. Springer, 2021. 
60. Novikova K. S. Artificial intelligence as an element of e-justice: smart solution and electronic scales of justice. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2020, no. 3, pp. 240—244. (In Russ.) 
61. Chernogor N. N. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Transformation of Modern Law and Order. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.037. 
62. Ivliev G. P., Egorova M. A. Legal Issues of the Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence and Products Created by Artificial Intelligence Systems. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 32—46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.060.
63. Zaitsev O. A. Features of the Use of Electronic Information as Criminal Evidence: A Comparative-Legal Analysis of Foreign Legislation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2019, no. 4, pp. 42—57. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2019.4.4. 
64. Zaytsev O., Yepihin A. State Protection and Safety of Participants in Russian Criminal Proceedings. Internal Security, 2016, vol. 8, iss. 1

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate