Везде
The Impact of the Judicial Practice Analysis on the Improvement of the Institution of an Authorized Economic Operator
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Impact of the Judicial Practice Analysis on the Improvement of the Institution of an Authorized Economic Operator
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.12737/jrp.2023.010
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marina Niyazova 
ORCID: 0000-0001-5638-6959
Occupation: Associate Professor at the Department of Civil Law Disciplines
Affiliation: Vladivostok State University
Address: Vladivostok, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 1
Pages
123-137
Abstract

The development of Russian the Institute of Authorized Economic Operators (AEO) within of increased uncertainty and structural transformation of the economy is a counter-sanction tool for supporting participants in foreign economic activity, reducing their non-production costs. One of the main issues faced by the customs developing the national institute of AEO is the assessment of the applicant for compliance with the conditions of inclusion (exclusion) in the AEO register. The list of basic conditions bases usually on the SAFE Framework, the Integrated Supply Chain Management Guide, and national and international supply chain safety standards, and contains in the legislation of the country. However, it is often not sufficient and requires the use of additional criteria for assigning (depriving) the status of an AEO. The article devotes to the development of the AEO institute and proposes the use of the potential for analyzing judicial practice of arbitration court in the assessment of AEO applicants as one of the ways to improve the Institute.

The author uses general theoretical, economic and static, formal legal methods, methods of system research and of analyzing law enforcement practice.

The paper shows that the information received from judicial review is matter for making decisions for inclusion in the register of the Federal Customs Service of Russia and developing additional criteria for assessment of applicants. This conclusion is based on the analysis of judicial practice of arbitration court in 2018—2021 related to the assignment of the status of an AEO to applicants, and economic judicial practice involving AEO. The result of the AEO' quantitative analysis identifies four main groups of activity in the arbitration court by the total number of disputes, the plaintiff and the defendant, and their ratio. Qualitative analysis reveals disputes arising from administrative legal relations with the participation of tax and customs, and clarifies the AEO grouping on damage to the state.

The obtained results expand the understanding of AEO in terms of geographical composition and activity in the arbitration court, and contribute to the stability of the institute in conditions of sanction pressure as a part of Russian customs law system.

Keywords
register of authorized economic operators, inclusion conditions, evaluation criteria, customs authorities, plaintiff, defendant, dispute, analysis of law enforcement practice
Date of publication
26.01.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
181
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Alekseev S. S. The General Theory of Law: textbook. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2009. 576 p. (In Russ.)
2.	Alekseevskaya E. I. Terms of use of judicial acts for machine learning (analysis of some judicial decisions on the protection of property rights). Law Enforcement Review, 2020, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 102—114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(4).102-114.
3.	Dong J., Kim K., Moon K. AEO (Authorized Economic Operator) Automated Platform for Supply Chain Security. 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, 2018. Pp. 1077—1079.
4.	General Theory of State and Law. Academic Course. Ed. by M. N. Marchenko. Vol. 3: Gosudarstvo, pravo, obshchestvo. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2007. 712 p. (In Russ.)
5.	Gladkov A. R. Analysis of the provisions on international customs cooperation of the WCO Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade. Customs Service of Russia: priorities, opportunities, prospects: Materials of the XI International Scientific Conference. Ed. by V. B. Mantusov. Moscow, 2020. Pp. 13—18. (In Russ.)
6.	Huang H. H. Authorized Economic Operator in Taiwan — An Example of International Freight Forwarders. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. IEEE. 2016. Pp. 172—176. DOI: 10.1109/ICMIT.2016.7605028.
7.	Huang H. H. Authorized Economic Operator. International Conference on Economics and Management Engineering (ICEME 2016) and International Conference on Economics and Business Management (EBM 2016), 2016. Pp. 15—18.
8.	Jimenez D. P., Montoya R. A. G., Bernal E. M. Advantages of the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) at international level and teaching opportunities in logistics and international business programs. Revista Virtual Universidad Catolica del Norte, 2021, no. 62, pp. 189—214. DOI: 10.35575/rvucn.n62a8.
9.	Kopteva L. A., Borisova E. M. Legal basis of the institution of authorized economic operator and its role in ensuring the economic security of Russia. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 2020, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 45. (In Russ.)
10.	Miled M. S., Fiore C. The “Authorized Economic Operator” certification and Firm performance. International Conference on Advanced Logistics & Transport (ICALT 2014). 2014. Pp. 167—172.
11.	Mozolev K. I., Golovnya A. E. Actual Directions of Improving the Institute of the Authorized Economic Operator in the Eurasian Economic Union. European Scientific Conference: collection of articles of the V International Scientific Conference. Part 2. Penza, 2017. Pp. 147—150. (In Russ.)
12.	Nekrasov D. V. Administrative-Legal Status of the Authorized Economic Operator in the New Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union. Vestnik Rossiyskoy tamozhennoy akademii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 97—104. (In Russ.)
13.	Niyazova M. V., Adamova O. V., Kostik E. E. The Institute of the Authorized Economic Operator: Experience of India, Possibilities for Russia. Tamozhennaya politika Rossii na Dal'nem
14.	Vostoke, 2019, no. 1(86), pp. 52—60. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17238/ISSN1815-0683.2019.1.52.
15.	Ponomareva K. A. Judicial precedent as a source of tax law. Law Enforcement Review, 2018, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 20—24. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24147/25421514.2018.2(2).20-24.
16.	Prokhorenko T. N. Improvement of the Institution of an Authorized Economic Operator in the Eurasian Economic Union and its Development in the Republic of Belarus. Shkola nauki, 2018, no. 4, pp. 4—5. (In Russ.)
17.	Rudneva Z. S. Development of the Institution of an Authorized Economic Operator in the Context of the WCO Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade. Vestnik Khabarovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta ekonomiki i prava, 2017, no. 4—5, pp. 50—57. (In Russ.)
18.	Salnikova A. V. Evolution of the Institution of an Authorized Economic Operator: Innovations of the Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union. Innovative processes in economic, social and spiritual spheres of life of society: Materials of the VIII International Scientific Conference. Praga, 2018. Pp. 9—14. (In Russ.)
19.	Valencia L. A., Saldana J. E. S. Economic Operators Authorized in Colombia: Can the Standardized Model of the World Customs Organization Enable National Insertion within the World Foreign Trade Reality? Panorama, 2015, vol. 9, iss. 17, pp. 124—131.
20.	Varavenko V. E., Niyazova M. V. The Analysis of Legal Aspects of an Educational Process as a Means of the Productivity Increase of Productivity in University. Yurist vuza, 2012, no. 1, pp. 7—14. (In Russ.)
21.	Vladimirova V. A., Kuskov A. N. Development of the Institution of the Authorized Economic Operator in Japan. Vektor ekonomiki, 2020, no. 4, p. 20. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate