Везде
Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Law: Is Palingenesis Acceptable in the Context of Digitalization?
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Law: Is Palingenesis Acceptable in the Context of Digitalization?
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2023.106
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vadim Khiluta 
ORCID: 0000-0001-7872-949X
Occupation: Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
Affiliation: Yanka Kupala Grodno State University
Address: Grodno, Belarus
Edition
Volume 27 No. 9
Pages
90-103
Abstract

The article deals with the problem of the possibility of recognizing artificial intelligence as a subject of criminal responsibility. The vectors of the criminal law development are determined and modern doctrinal approaches and trends are analyzed in detail in relation to a positive or negative answer to the question of whether artificial intelligence can be a subject of criminal responsibility, the reasons for the transformation of criminal law and possible consequences are substantiated. Research objectives: to determine the directions of development of criminal law in the period of modernization of public relations and the possibility of recognizing artificial intelligence as a subject of criminal responsibility; to identify a category of persons who may potentially be subjects of criminal responsibility for intentional or careless illegal acts committed by artificial intelligence.

Research objectives: to determine the essence of artificial intelligence on the basis of existing approaches in order to solve the question of the possibility of granting it a legal status and prospects for criminal prosecution.

The study used traditional methods of socio-legal and formal dogmatic analysis: documentary, comparative legal, analytical, systemic, and logical.

According to the results of the study, it is proposed to apply the existing rules for the qualification of illegal acts in the case of crimes committed by artificial intelligence, i. e. to bring only individuals to criminal responsibility. In the case of establishing signs of careless forms of guilt in the actions of creators, developers, users of artificial intelligence systems, traditional approaches to assessing the establishment of negligent forms of guilt should be revised. The legislative indication in the existing concept of the negligent form of guilt to the normative element characterizing the fact that the culprit should have and could have foreseen the possibility of socially dangerous consequences defines negligence as an evaluative concept that goes beyond formal psychological signs. This indicates that in reality today the guilty person is being punished not for the consequences, but for the actions that caused them.

Keywords
criminal law, artificial intelligence, guilt, negligence, criminal liability, legal liability, legal personality, regulatory methods, criminal law
Date of publication
20.09.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
138
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Balkin J. M. Free speech in the algorithmic society: Big data, private governance, and new school speech regulation. U. C. Davis Law Review, 2018, no. 51(3), pp. 1149—1210. 
2. Broadhurst R., Brown P., Maxim D., Trivedi H., Wang J. Artificial Intelligence and Crime. Report of the Australian National University Cybercrime Observatory for the Korean Institute of Criminology. Canberra, 2019. 63 p. 
3. Hallevy G. Unmanned vehicles — Subordination to criminal law under the modern concept of criminal liability. Journal of Law, Information and Science, 2012, no. 21. Available at: https: // ssrn. com/abstract=2696053. 
4. Lopashenko N. A., Kobzeva E. V., Rozhavskiy Z. D. Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Law Risks. State and Law in the Context of Modern Challenges, 2022. Vol. 122: European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. Pp. 398—404. 
5. Nilsson N. J. The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements. Cambridge, 2009. 707 p. 
6. Scherer M. U. Regulatng Artfcial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 2015, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 353—400. 
7. Solaiman S. M. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2017, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 155—179. 
8. Taddeo M., Floridi L. Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race. Nature, 2018, no. 556, pp. 296—298. 
9. White P. J., Podaima B. W., Friesen M. R. Algorithms for Smartphone and Tablet Image Analysis for Healthcare Applications. IEEE Access, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 831—840. 
10. Antonova E. Yu. Artificial intelligence technologies — the subject of crime or a tool / means of committing criminals? Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2022, no. 1, pp. 31—39. (In Russ. ) 
11. Begishev I. R. Criminal legal protection of public relations related to robotics. Dr. diss. thesis. Kazan', 2022. 48 p. (In Russ. ) 
12. Kibal'nik A. G., Volosyuk P. V. Artificial intelligence: criminal law doctrinal questions awaiting answers. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii, 2018, no. 4, pp. 173—178. (In Russ. ) 
13. Lolaeva A. S., Sakaeva K. U. Artificial Intelligence: legal and ethical aspects. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya, 2021, no. 8, pp. 63—71. (In Russ. ) 
14. Russkevich E. A., Dmitrenko A. P., Kadnikov N. G. Crisis and Palingenesis (rebirth) of criminal law in the context of digitalization. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, 2022, no. 3, vol. 13, pp. 585—598. (In Russ. ) 
15. Savenok A. L. Limits of criminal-legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence technologies. Predvaritel'noe rassledovanie, 2022, no. 2. pp. 19—23. (In Russ. ) 
16. Khilyuta V. V. Criminal negligence and its content in the context of the psychological theory of guilt. Pravo. by, 2022, no. 3, pp. 65—73. (In Russ. ) 
17. Khisamova Z. I., Begishev I. R. The essence of artificial intelligence and the problem of defining legal personality. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya, 2020, no. 2, pp. 96—106. (In Russ. ) 
18. Khisamova Z. I., Begishev I. R. Criminal Responsibility and Artificial Intelligence: Theoretical and Applied Aspects. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal, 2019, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 564—574. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate