Везде
Legal Science in the Light of the Prospects of Digitalization
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Legal Science in the Light of the Prospects of Digitalization
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.12737/jrp.2023.013
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Valeriy Lazarev 
ORCID: 0000-0003-0910-0609
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 2
Pages
5-19
Abstract

The processes of network digitalization and the introduction of artificial intelligence need special consideration by lawyers. While it is one-sidedly categorical to conclude that the processes of globalization and scientific and technological development — in particular, the emergence of network digital technologies — destroy traditional ideas about the state and law, society, politics and economics. The state-legal ideas of the great thinkers of the past need to be comprehended in the light of new digital realities and — in accordance with the law of denial of denial — must be integrated into modern legal science.

The author draws attention to the new processes and phenomena of the public life in information age, which can enter the subject of legal science, give rise to questions and answers in it — which can bring novelty to the solution of theoretical and practical problems of classical science — open up new scientific directions. In this regard, the methodology of legal research is also enriched. The rational and the irrational, the materialistic and the idealistic, in the light of the principle of complementarity, turn out to be conjugated in the search for, among other things, virtual values. Opposite positions can be integrated on the basis of healthy conservatism and in paradigms of cooperation, avoidance of conflicts and social upheavals. Convergent approaches do not lose their role. Among special methods, mathematical ones are gaining importance, but for legal science and practice, it is not the calculus itself that is of value, but its understanding in terms of the development of humanitarian values.

In modern conditions, lawyers must think through the boundaries in which artificial intelligence is allowed to independently think and understand the emotional experiences of an individual. Legal science should focus on building a virtual fractal model, in which an idea of integrity would be given by its calculated segments. These can be sources of law that allow one to see the legal map of the world, and on its basis it is possible to create a digital legal map with the prospect of using it in international legal communication.

In a general description of modern legal science, the author states with regret that it belongs to the world of modern consumer labels, under which simulacra — that are pleasing and beneficial to manufacturers — are produced and reproduced.

Keywords
legal science, digital technologies, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, legal relations, digitalization of elements of the legal system, digital legal map of the world
Date of publication
20.02.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
242
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Aleshkova I. A. Tsifrovoy status lichnosti i pravovoy status iskusstvennogo intellekta: novoe v yuridicheskikh konstruktsiyakh. Pravo, tsifrovye tekhnologii i iskusstvennyy intellekt. Ed. by E. V. Alferova. Moscow, 2021. 
2.	Andreev V. K. Dynamics of Regulating Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 3, pp. 58—68. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.030. Avak'yan S. A. Informatsionnoe prostranstvo znaniy, tsifrovoy mir i konstitutsionnoe pravo. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2019, no. 7. 
3.	Begishev I. R. Iskusstvennyy intellekt i robot kak pravovye kategorii. Bezopasnost' biznesa, 2020, no. 6. 
4.	Bondar N. S. Information and Digital Space in the Constitutional Dimension: From the Practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 11, pp. 25—42. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2019.11.2 
5.	Fedorina A. A. K voprosu o pravovom statuse robototekhniki i iskusstvennogo intellekta. Biznes i pravo. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu “Predprinimatel'skoe pravo”, 2018, no. 4. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1. 
6.	Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_1_7. 
7.	Kolokolov N. A. Eshche raz ob iskusstvennom intellekte v pravosudii. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo, 2020, no. 4. 
8.	Kontseptsiya tsifrovogo gosudarstva i tsifrovoy pravovoy sredy. Ed. by N. N. Chernogor, D. A. Pashentsev. Moscow, 2021. 
9.	Kravets I. A. Informatsionnyy i tsifrovoy konstitutsionalizm i konstitutsionnye obshchestvennye initsiativy v usloviyakh rossiyskogo pravovogo prostranstva. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2020, no. 9. 
10.	Lazarev V. V. Pravu byt'. Retsenziya na monografiyu: Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. Budushchee prava. Nasledie akademika V. S. Stepina i yuridicheskaya nauka. Moscow, 2020. 176 p. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost', 2022, no. 3. 
11.	Mikhaleva E. S., Shubina E. A. Problemy i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniya robototekhniki. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2019, no. 12. 
12.	Minbaleev A. V. Tsifrovye pravootnosheniya: ponyatie, vidy, struktura, ob”ekty. Tsifrovoe pravo: textbook. Ed. by V. V. Blazheev, M. A. Egorova. Moscow, 2020. 
13.	Morkhat P. M. Pravosub”ektnost' iskusstvennogo intellekta v sfere prava: grazhdanskopravovye problemy. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2018.
14.	Nevinskiy V. V. “Tsifrovye prava” cheloveka: sushchnost', sistema, znachenie. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo, 2019, no. 10. 
15.	Pevtsova E. A. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Activity of a Person. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 9, pp. 19—31. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.103. 
16.	Polyakov S. B., Gilev I. A. Algoritmy sudebnogo resheniya. Perm', 2020. Popondopulo V. F. Pravovye formy tsifrovykh otnosheniy. Yurist, 2019, no. 6. 
17.	Pravo, tsifrovye tekhnologii i iskusstvennyy intellekt. Ed. by E. V. Alferova. Moscow, 2021. 
18.	Serova O. A. Roboty kak uchastniki tsifrovoy ekonomiki: problemy opredeleniya pravovoy prirody. Grazhdanskoe pravo, 2018, no. 3. 
19.	Umnova I. A., Alferova E. V., Aleshkova I. A. Tsifrovoe razvitie i prava cheloveka. Moscow, 2021. 
20.	Umnova-Konyukhova I. A. Pravo budushchego v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii i ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekt. Pravo, tsifrovye tekhnologii i iskusstvennyy intellekt. Ed. by E. V. Alferova. Moscow, 2021.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate