Везде
The Specialization of Courts and Judges in the Judicial Systems of the Countries of the Eurasian Economic Union
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Specialization of Courts and Judges in the Judicial Systems of the Countries of the Eurasian Economic Union
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2023.120
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elvira Ablaeva 
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Higher School of Law “Adilet”
Affiliation: Caspian University
Address: Almaty, Kazakhstan
Edition
Volume 27 No. 10
Pages
130-147
Abstract

The study is devoted to determining the role and place of the principle of specialization of courts and judges in the judicial system and judicial proceedings of the EAEU member states, a number of which are undergoing reforms in this area. The topic chosen by the author is actualized in the context of globalization and intensified activation of measures to increase the competitiveness of all countries in the international arena, as well as the implementation of institutional reforms to ensure the rule of law, in particular in Kazakhstan.

The purpose of the article is to study the judicial system and judicial proceedings of the EAEU countries, organized and functioning in the post-Soviet space on the principle of judicial specialization, in compliance with continuity and gradual development in law and the state. The realization of this goal has determined the importance of solving the following tasks: 1) identification of the main factors that caused the appearance of previously unknown specialized courts in the EAEU member states; 2) identification of the presence of borrowings and differences in the judicial system and judicial proceedings of these countries; 3) conducting a comparative legal analysis of legislation and law enforcement practice in the judicial systems of these countries.

The methodological basis of the research was made up of general logical, theoretical, empirical, special legal methods of cognition (historical and legal, legal modeling, comparative jurisprudence).

The work uses an extensive database of existing regulatory legal acts of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia concerning issues of judicial power, judicial system and judicial proceedings. The conceptual, declarative and programmatic documents on the reform and development of the judicial systems of the listed countries are considered. The opinions of legal scholars whose scientific works are devoted to issues of judicial specialization are analyzed.

Keywords
specialization of courts, specialization of judges, judicial specialization, specialized courts, courts of Kazakhstan, Russian courts, courts of Kyrgyzstan, courts of Armenia, courts of Belarus, Eurasian Economic Union
Date of publication
25.10.2023
Number of purchasers
10
Views
111
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bruff H. H. Specialized courts in administrative law. Administrative Law Review, 1991, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 329—366. 
2. Balotti R. F., Brandel R. E. Business bench: Are special courts the future? Business Law Today, 1995, vol. 4, no. 3. 
3. Lapp J. A. Special Courts. The American Political Science Review, 1914, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 633—636. 
4. Vanessa Casado Perez. Specialization trend. Environmental Law, 2019, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 587—593. 
5. Vidashev I. I. Specialization of courts and judges as a means of improving the quality of justice. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2010, no. 7(26), pp. 125—128. (In Russ. ) 
6. Dolgova A. I. The need to introduce specialized labor courts in Russia: pros and cons. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta, 2012, vol. 154, book 4, pp. 96—101. (In Russ. ) 
7. Zamyshlyaev D. M. Types of judicial jurisdictions. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2016. 244 p. (In Russ. ) 
8. Izvarina A. F. On the issue of the creation of specialized courts. Yurist-pravoved, 2007, no. 5, pp. 49—54. (In Russ. ) 
9. Kleandrov M. I. On the Model of the Global Justice Radical Autonomation in the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 3, pp. 31—42. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/6583. 
10. Popondopulo V. F., Slepchenko E. V. About the organization of the judicial system of Russia. Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2007, no. 1(7), pp. 63—74. (In Russ. ) 
11. Romanets Yu. V. Specialization in judicial activity as a means of improving the efficiency of justice. Problems of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations: Materials International scientific and practical conference. Krasnodar, 2002. Pp. 5—13. (In Russ.) 
12. Silanteva E. E. The principle of specialization in the judicial system of Ukraine at a new stage of judicial and legal reform. Problemy zakonnosti, 2011, no. 116, pp. 255—267. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate