Везде
Criminal Legal Mechanisms for Ensuring National Security
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Criminal Legal Mechanisms for Ensuring National Security
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2023.128
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Stanislav Nudel 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6699-5694
Occupation: Head of the Center of Criminal and Criminal Procedure Legislation
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 11
Pages
62-74
Abstract

The article analyzes the current trends in the formation and implementation of criminal law mechanisms to ensure national security on the basis of doctrinal approaches.

The purpose of the study is to develop conceptual provisions for the theory of ensuring national security through criminal legal influence and to prepare a set of scientifically based proposals for the modernization of criminal legal regulation. In achieving this goal, special attention in the context of ensuring national security is paid to solving problems related to determining the object of criminal legal protection, identifying problems of the institution of administrative prejudice in the mechanism for ensuring national security and assessing the prospects for criminalization in the development of information technology.

The dialectical method of cognition, general scientific methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis, comparison and generalization, as well as special legal methods: comparative legal, logical legal, etc., are defined as the methodological basis of the study.

The article argues the conclusion that national security, as a state of protection of the national interests of the Russian Federation, must be ensured by the state, including through the implementation of criminal legal mechanisms as a response to the most dangerous threats.

Keywords
national security, crime, criminal liability, object of crime, criminalization, administrative prejudice
Date of publication
10.11.2023
Number of purchasers
10
Views
189
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Vinokurov V. N. Object of the crime: doctrinal and applied research. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2022. 368 p. (In Russ. ) 
2. Golovanova N. A., Gravina A. A., Zaytsev O. A. et al. Jurisdictional lawful activities within the criminal law sphere framework in the context of digitalization. Moscow, 2019. 212 p. (In Russ. ) 
3. Gordienko V. V. Legislative Determination of Criminal Offence and Exclusion of the Institute of Refusal Materials. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’, 2010, no. 15, pp. 11—13. (In Russ. ) 
4. Kibalnik A. G. Inadmissibility of administrative prejudice in criminal legislation. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, 2013, no. 2, pp. 119—125. (In Russ. ) 
5. Khabrieva T. Y., Tikhomirov Yu. A. (eds). Concepts of the development of Russian legislation. Moscow, 2010. 732 p. (In Russ. ) 
6. Lopashenko N. A. Say No to Administrative Prejudice in Criminal Law! Vestnik Akademii General’noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2011, no. 3, pp. 64—71. (In Russ. ) 
7. Khabrieva T. Y., Tikhomirov Yu. A. (eds). Scientific Concept of Development of the Russian Legislation. 7th ed. Moscow, 2015. 544 p. (In Russ. ) 
8. Nikiforov B. S. The Selected Works. Ed. by A. A. Gravina. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ. ) 
9. Nikiforov B. S. Object of a crime under Soviet criminal law. Moscow, 1960. 229 p. (In Russ. ) 
10. Nudel S. L. The Constitutional System as an Object of Criminal Law Protection. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 121—132. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jrl. 2022. 1332. 
11. Nudel S. L. Modernization of Criminal Policy: Problems of Legal Regulation. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5—22. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jrp. 2023. 001. 
12. Khabrieva T. Y., Lebedev V. M. (eds). Justice in the Modern World. Moscow, 2012. (In Russ. ) 
13. Razgildiev B. T. Tasks of the criminal law of the Russian Federation and their implementation. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 1994. 38 p. (In Russ. ) 
14. Reshetnikov A. Yu. Criminal offense and unfinished crime: common ground. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2017, no. 4, pp. 104—108. (In Russ. ) 
15. Khabrieva T. Y. National interests and legislative priorities of Russia. Journal of Russian Law, 2005, no. 12. (In Russ. ) 
16. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/art_2018_9_1. 
17. Shergin A. P., Shergina K. F. Problems of integration of administrative and criminal responsibility. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii, 2010, no. 4(12), pp. 13—20. (In Russ. ) 
18. Zatelepin O. K. Criminal legal protection of military security of the Russian Federation. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2013. 58 p. (In Russ. ) 
19. Melnichenko A. B. Criminal legal means of ensuring the national security of the Russian Federation. Dr. diss. thesis. Rostov-on-Don, 2009. 72 p. (In Russ. ) 
20. Duyunov V. K., Zakomoldin R. V. Criminal law impact in the mechanism of ensuring national security. Moscow, 2020. 244 p. (In Russ. ) 
21. Печегин Д. А. Legal mechanisms for the protection of state digital sovereignty: a comparative legal aspect // Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2022, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 9—20. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate