Везде
Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in a Criminal Proceeding: A Critical View
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Judge’s Dissenting Opinion in a Criminal Proceeding: A Critical View
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2023.129
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ilia Dikarev 
ORCID: 0000-0002-4178-744X
Occupation: Director of the Institute of Law
Affiliation: Volgograd State University
Address: Volgograd, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 11
Pages
75-88
Abstract

The idea of a judge's right to a dissenting opinion being one of the key guarantees of the principle of judicial independence is perceived by a legal community as an axiom. For this reason, the institution of a dissenting opinion extremely rarely happens to be the subject of a critical analysis in a legal science. Meanwhile, such an analysis reveals a whole complex of contradictions between the right of a judge to a dissenting opinion and certain principles of judicial proceedings, as well as the negative effect of the use of such a right by judges manifested in a decrease in the authority of justice.

The purpose of the study is to clarify the reasons for granting judges in criminal proceedings the right to express a dissenting opinion and, on this basis, to decide on the expediency of preserving the relevant institution in procedural law. Achieving this goal involves solving a set of tasks related to the study of the correlation of the institution of a judge’s dissenting opinion with the principles of adversarial parties and independence of judges, the requirement of secrecy of the meeting of judges as well as the study of dissenting opinion as a tool for individualizing the figure of a judge who does not agree with the decision made in the case.

A dialectical method served as the methodological basis of the study. In addition, general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis and a systematic approach were used as well as special legal methods: historical-legal, legal interpretation and logical-legal interpretation.

The results of the study demonstrated that a dissenting opinion is attached importance to as a means of protecting the professional honor of a judge allowing him to openly declare his disagreement with the decision. According to this approach, the opposition of two values is exposed — the professional honor of a judge and the authority of justice. Their comparison allows us to assert that the authority of justice is a priority value that cannot be sacrificed for the sake of providing the judge with the opportunity to individualize his figure. In this regard, it is concluded that it is necessary to eliminate the institution of a judge’s special opinion in procedural law.

Keywords
dissenting opinion, secrecy of the meeting of judges, composition of the court, collegiality, authority of justice
Date of publication
10.11.2023
Number of purchasers
10
Views
165
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Alyabyshev M. S. A Special Opinion on the Special Opinion. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2015, no. 10, pp. 32—35. (In Russ. ) 
2. Bykov V. M., Manova N. S. On the Judge’s Right to a Special Opinion: Continuation of the Topic. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2016, no. 3, pp. 45—48. (In Russ. ) 
3. Sharipova A. R. Conceptual Foundations of Intersectoral Convergence in Criminal Proceedings. Dr. diss. Ufa, 2022. 503 p. (In Russ. ) 
4. Bykov V. M., Manova N. S. Dissenting Opinion of the Judge: the Law is New and the Problems are Old. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2014, no. 1, pp. 48—50. (In Russ. ) 
5. Vydrya M. M. Participants in Court Proceedings and Guarantees of Their Rights. Krasnodar, 1979. 101 p. (In Russ. ) 
6. Davydov V. A. The Procedure for the Meeting of Judges When Considering a Criminal Case in the Presidium of the Court Needs a More Detailed Settlement. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2011, no. 6, pp. 35—37. (In Russ. ) 
7. Dikarev I. S. Dissenting Opinion of Judge: the Question of the Legal Consequences. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2014, no. 10, pp. 56—59. (In Russ. ) 
8. Dikarev I. S. The Confidentiality of Judicial Deliberations as a Guarantee of Principle of Freedom of the Evidence Evaluation. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2008, no. 7, pp. 11—12. (In Russ. ) 
9. Zus L. Dissenting Opinion of Judge. Sovetskaya yustitsiya, 1989, no. 11, p. 29. (In Russ. ) 
10. Ishchenko U. S. Independence of Judges as a Principle of Criminal Proceedings. Cand. diss. Nizhny Novgorod, 2021. 320 p. (In Russ. ) 
11. Orlov A. K. (ed. ). Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR. Moscow, 1976. 624 p. (In Russ. ) 
12. Koshcheeva E. S., Kapustina A. V. Dissenting Opinion of the Judge: Disputable Issues Theory and Legal Practice. Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta (filiala) MGYuA, 2021, no. 4(50), pp. 76—79. (In Russ. ) 
13. Krapivkina O. A. Dissenting Opinion of the Judge vs Collegial Decision of the Court or Individualism vs Institutionalism. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2012, no. 2, pp. 231—235. (In Russ. ) 
14. Lykov D. A., Dikarev I. S. Dissenting Opinion of a Judge as a Manifestation of the Disintegration of the Judiciary Board. Pravovoe gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2022, no. 2, pp. 94—101. (In Russ. ) 
15. Mashinnikova N. O. Dissenting Opinion of the Judge as an Exceptional Form of Expression of Judicial Discretion in the Administration of Justice in Criminal Proceedings. In: Unity and Differentiation of Pre-trial and Judicial Proceedings in Criminal Proceedings: New Conceptual Approaches in the Light of the Legacy of the Great Judicial Reform [Text]: collection of scientific articles of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, dedicated to the 155th anniversary of the Judicial statutes of 1864, timed to the 55th anniversary of Southwestern State University (November 14—15, 2019). Kursk, 2019. Pp. 230—233. (In Russ. ) 
16. Merzlyakova M. V., Proshlyakov A. D. Revision of Verdicts, Determinations and Orders that Have Entered Into Legal Force by Supervision. Moscow, 2011. 176 p. (In Russ. ) 
17. Motovilovker Ya. O. Some Issues of the Theory of the Soviet Criminal Process in the View of the New Criminal Procedure Legislation. Part two. Ed. by P. I. Borod’ko. Kemerovo, 1964. 152 p. (In Russ. ) 
18. Muradyan E. M. Judicial Law (in the Context of the Three Codes of Procedure). Moscow, 2003. 128 p. (In Russ. ) 
19. Sidorenko E. V. Sukhankina L. I. Some Problems of Legal Regulation of the Institution of a Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in the Review of Court Decisions. In: Kalinovskiy K. B. Verification of the Legality and Validity of Court Decisions in Criminal Proceedings: collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference, St. Petersburg, North-West Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (October 16—17, 2020). St. Petersburg, 2021. Pp. 321—329. (In Russ. ) 
20. Smolkova I. “Witness Immunity” of Judge: On the Issue of the Secrecy of the Deliberation Room. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 1998, no. 5, pp. 4—5. (In Russ. ) 
21. Smol’kova I. V. The Confidentiality of Judicial Deliberations and Dissenting Opinion of Judge. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2006, no. 3, pp. 172—175. (In Russ. ) 
22. Strogovich M. S. Course of Soviet Criminal Procedure. Vol. II. Moscow, 1970. 516 p. (In Russ. ) 
23. Sukhanova N. N. Dissenting Opinion of a Judge When Sentencing. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2007, no. 10, pp. 46—48. (In Russ. )
24. Khaldeev L. S. Judge in a Criminal Proceedings. Moscow, 2000. 501 p. (In Russ. ) 
25. Sukhanova N. N. Judgment of Acquittal in Russian Criminal Proceedings. Cand. diss. thesis. Irkutsk, 2008. 24 p. (In Russ. ) 
26. Tarasov A. A. Sole and Collegial in Criminal Proceedings: Legal and Socio-Psychological Problems. Samara, 2001. 312 p. (In Russ. ) 
27. Tarasov A. A., Gizatullin I. A. Independence of Judges and Procedural Problems of its Implementation in Criminal Proceedings. Moscow, 2022. 224 p. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate