Везде
Legal Means of Improving Federal State Control (Supervision) in the Sphere of Migration
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Legal Means of Improving Federal State Control (Supervision) in the Sphere of Migration
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2023.130
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Inna Plyugina 
Occupation: Leading Researcher, Center of Public Law Studies
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 11
Pages
89-102
Abstract

In an effort to counteract illegal migration and ensure the implementation of state migration policy, public authorities in many countries are making significant efforts to form a migration control system that allows for the effective implementation of strategic tasks and minimizing the associated risks and threats. Scientific and technological development has made it possible to use such tools as fingerprint registration, digital photography, face recognition systems, etc. for this purpose.

The author notes the following trends in the formation of control (supervision) systems in the field of migration: focus on further active implementation of technological advances; transfer of control (supervision) measures in one volume or another to the supranational level; implementation of individual measures in transit or exit countries, etc.

The legislation of the Russian Federation provides for a set of legal means to ensure the implementation of federal state control (supervision) in the field of migration; at the same time, proposals for its improvement can be identified. At the same time, the article assesses the novelties provided for in the draft federal law “On the conditions for entry (exit) and stay (residence) in the Russian Federation of foreign citizens and stateless persons” (controlled stay regime, loyalty agreement, etc. ).

Keywords
migration, foreign citizens, migration control, federal state control (supervision) in the field of migration, state sovereignty, fingerprint registration
Date of publication
10.11.2023
Number of purchasers
10
Views
115
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernández. Crimmigration Law. 2nd ed. ABA Book Publishing, 2022. 304 p. 
2. César Cuauhtémoc Garcia Hernández. What is Crimmigration Law? Insightson Law and Society, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 3, pp. 22—25. 
3. Elden S. Contingent Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity and the Sanctity of Borders. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 2006, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 11—24. DOI: 10. 1353/sais. 2006. 0008. 
4. Palm E. Externalized Migration Governance and the Limits of Sovereignty: The Case of Partnership Agreements between EU and Libya. Theoria, 2020, vol. 86, iss. 1, pp. 9—27. DOI: 10. 1111/theo. 12224. 
5. Rosenberg-Rubins R. Crimmigration under International Protection: Constructing Criminal Law as Governmentality. London, 2023. 256 p. 
6. Sassen S. Regulating Immigration in a Global Age: A New Policy Landscape. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2000, vol. 570, iss. 1, pp. 35—45. DOI: 10. 1177/000271620057000105. 
7. Stumpf J. The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power. American University Law Review, 2006, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 367—419. 
8. Andrichenko L. V., Maslovskaya T. S., Plyugina I. V. State Administration of Migration Sphere: The Experience of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 53—68. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/ jflcl. 2022. 023. 
9. Andrichenko L. V., Plyugina I. V. Legal Issues of Providing Public Services in the Field of Migration. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 102—114. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/ jrl. 2022. 075. 
10. Grigoreva K. S. Migration securitization: review of foreign empirical research. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Seriya 2: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2021, no. 4-5, pp. 48—63. (In Russ. ) 
11. Zubarev S. M. On correlation of concepts of “control” and “supervision” in public management. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 2014, no. 10, pp. 31—36. (In Russ. ) 
12. Kiseleva N. G. Foreign experience of implementation of the state control (supervision) in the sphere of migration. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 3(47), pp. 113—119. (In Russ. ) 
13. Kudilinskiy M. N. Control as a type of the state governance. Correlation of the terms “control” and “supervision”. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2015, no. 8, pp. 47—52. (In Russ. ) 
14. Vlasov I. S., Golovanova N. A. (eds). Immigration and crime: the comparative analysis. Moscow, 2012. (In Russ. ) 
15. Nozdrachev A. F., Zyryanov S. M., Kalmykova A. V. Reform of State Control (Supervision) in the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 9, pp. 34—46. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/ article_599d74421f88b5. 06552344. 
16. Pitukhina M. A. On the issues of securitization of migration in Russia. National Security, 2014, no. 2, pp. 276—282. (In Russ. ) 
17. Potemkina O. Multilevel Governance of the EU Migration Policy. Sovremennaya Evropa, 2020, no. 2, pp. 100—110. DOI: 10. 15211/soveurope22020100110. 
18. Sandugey A. N. On improving the legal arrangements of state control (supervision) in the field of immigration. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 4(52), pp. 109—116. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate