Везде
Legal Regulation of Religious Relations as a Factor in the Reintegration of the Crimean Peninsula into Russia
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Legal Regulation of Religious Relations as a Factor in the Reintegration of the Crimean Peninsula into Russia
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/jrp.2024.1.5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Stanislav Vasilev 
ORCID: 0000-0003-2752-240X
Occupation: Head of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Sevastopol State University; Associate Professor at the Department of Theoretical and Public Law Disciplines, Institute of State and Law, University of Tyumen
Affiliation:
Sevastopol State University
University of Tyumen
Address: Sevastopol, Tyumen, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 No. 1
Pages
95-107
Abstract

The entry in March 2014 of the Crimean Peninsula into Russia has significantly changed the lives of the population of this territory, and also influenced international relations with the participation of the Russian Federation. However, so far the processes related to the complete transition of the Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol into the domestic legal field have not been completed. In some sectors of the economy, the deadlines for the completion of such “transitional” measures are constantly being extended. At the same time, the religious sphere did not require significant changes. The changes that began in Ukraine after 2014, scandals and harassment against religious organizations, unthinkable in Russia, only strengthen believers in the correctness of their choice. The significance of this study is actualized by the prospect of passing through similar stages of adaptation of regulatory regulation and the practice of its application in the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, Zaporizhia and Kherson regions.

The purpose of the work is to compare the normative legal regulation of religious relations in Russia and Ukraine, as well as in the Republic of Crimea and the federal city of Sevastopol in order to formulate a conclusion about the degree of completion of the reintegration of the Crimean Peninsula into Russia. Research objectives: to study the Ukrainian legal regulation of these public relations in order to identify deviations unacceptable by the population of the territory in question; to search for similar norms in Russian legislation; to identify positive foreign experience; to determine the degree of activity of regional authorities in terms of support for confessional and interfaith relations.

The main method of research, in addition to general philosophical and general scientific ones, was comparative law. The method of modeling and expert assessments was also used in the formulation of the main author's conclusions.

According to the results of the study, it is stated that the reintegration of the Crimean Peninsula into Russia in terms of the legal regulation of religious relations has not begun, but rather continues, strengthened by measures taken by the law-making bodies of the neighboring state.

Keywords
reintegration, Crimea, Sevastopol, religious organizations, legal regulation, comparison of law, confessional relations, faith, Ukrainian Orthodox Church, religious tolerance
Date of publication
19.01.2024
Number of purchasers
6
Views
106
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Balakireva O., Sereda I. Religion and civil society in Ukraine and Russia. In: De Haart J., Dekker P., Halman L. (eds). Religion and civil society in Europe. Dordrecht, 2013. Pp. 219—250. 
2. Alinkina A. V., Vardanyan A. D., Gordeeva I. V. et al. Planning for the development of modern urban space: problems and trends. Moscow, 2023. 296 p. (In Russ.) 
3. Anastasov A. I., Dergunova E. S. Comparative analysis of the laws of the Russian Federation “On Foreign Agents” and the USA “On the Registration of Foreign Agents” (FARA). Zhurnal istoricheskikh, politologicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy, 2017, no. 1(60). (In Russ.) 
4. Baginyan K. A. Violation of the principle of non-interference by imperialist states. Moscow, 1954. 144 p. (In Russ.) 
5. Vasilev S. A., Potapova L. S. Adoption of the General Layout of Sevastopol as a Land Relationship Development Prospect. Gradostroitel'noe pravo, 2020, no. 1, pp. 24—26. (In Russ.) 
6. Vasileva O. Political management of the ethnocultural process in the south of Russia at the end of the 20th — beginning of the 21st century. Rossiya i musul'manskiy mir, 2012, no. 7, pp. 30—36. (In Russ.) 
7. Golikova S. V. The principle of priority of family education in the legislation of Russia and Ukraine: comparative legal analysis. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2012. 222 p. (In Russ.) 
8. Griva O. A., Yaksa N. V. The Fight of Ukraine for the Autocephal Church in the context of politicization of Religion. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, 2020, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 250— 258. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-2-250-258. 
9. Zenin S. S. The idea of sovereignty: from the divine principle to the transformation of the image. Mezhregional'nye Pimenovskie chteniya, 2019, no. 16, pp. 80—84. (In Russ.) 
10. Fadeev V. I. (ed). Institute of State and Municipal Services in Modern Law of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2016. 208 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Koval' V. N. Some Aspects of Determining How to Protect the Ownership of Real Estate. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 243—264. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24031/2226- 0781-2021-11-1-243-264. 
12. Kutsik A. Yu. Religious lay organizations and their influence on civil society in independent Ukraine. Religion and writing as factors in the formation of Slavic culture: collection of reports of the XXIII International Cyril and Methodius Readings. Minsk, 2018. Pp. 269—271. (In Russ.) 
13. Maracheva V. A. Control over the activities of persons under foreign influence: the new law and what is in the future for “potential” foreign agents. Agrarnoe i zemel'noe pravo, 2022, no. 8(212), pp. 45—47. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.47643/1815-1329_2022_8_45. 
14. Osavelyuk A. M. God in the spiritual and cultural foundation of Russian statehood. Constitutional reform — 2020 and prospects for the constitutional development of Russia: collection scientific labors on material All-Russian scientific-practical conference within the framework of the Saratov international legal forum, dedicated 90th anniversary of the Saratov State Law Academy. Saratov, 2021. Pp. 18—20. (In Russ.) 
15. Pivovarov D. V. Atheism: notion and kinds. Vestnik ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, 2009, no. 4, pp. 93—102. (In Russ.) 
16. Posrednikov D. V. On the issue of political subjectivity of Orthodox religious organizations in Ukraine. Zhurnal istoricheskikh, politologicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniy, 2017, no. 4(63), pp. 106—111. (In Russ.) 
17. Blazheev V. V., Pakhomov S. I. (eds). Problems of modernizing the range of scientific specialties for which academic degrees are awarded. Moscow, 2021. (In Russ.) 
18. Rakunov V. A. The doctrine “Moscow — the third Rome” and challenges of the modern geopolitical situation. Voprosy natsional'nykh i federativnykh otnosheniy, 2022, vol. 12, no. 6(87), pp. 1937—1944. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.35775/PSI.2022.87.6.004. 
19. Rosenko M. I. Comparative-legal analysis of the place and role of the authority of constitutional jurisdiction in the system of state management (on the example of Moldova, Ukraine). Pravo i praktika, 2019, no. 1, pp. 84—92. (In Russ.) 
20. Smulskiy E. V. On a problem of religious intolerance manifestations against neopagan organiozations in Ukraine. Sotsiosfera, 2013, no. 2, pp. 16—21. (In Russ.) 
21. Shabalina N. V., Piskun E. I. Tourism in the socio-economic development of the city of Sevastopol. Ekonomika i upravlenie: teoriya i praktika, 2023, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71—78. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate