The Doctrine of the Legal Subject in Russian Jurisprudence: From the Ideas of A. V. Mickiewicz to Modern Innovations
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Doctrine of the Legal Subject in Russian Jurisprudence: From the Ideas of A. V. Mickiewicz to Modern Innovations
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Larisa Khen 
Occupation: Postgraduate Student
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Pages
156-165
Abstract

The article reveals the conceptual foundations of the formation of the modern theory of the legal subject on the basis of the achievements that were made in this area during the Soviet period. The main attention is paid to the analysis of A. V. Mickiewicz's teaching about the legal subject. It is emphasized that the scientist inextricably linked the understanding of the subject of law with the concept of legal personality and its structure. He considered social relations to be the leading determinant of the legal subject, bringing to the fore in the theory of the legal subject not the personal, but the social aspect. The ideas of A. V. Mickiewicz are compared with the corresponding ideas of S. N. Bratus, as well as other researchers. It is emphasized that in modern conditions, the development of the doctrine of legal subject is influenced by the principles of post-non-classical scientific rationality with its inherent anthropocentrism. It is also noted that the theory of the legal subject is actualized by modern technological development, primarily digital and bio-technologies.

It is concluded that the teaching of A. V. Mickiewicz about the legal subject retains its relevance at the present stage of the development of legal science.

Keywords
legal subject, legal personality, structure of legal personality, A . V. Mickiewicz, S. N. Bratus, legal status
Date of publication
19.01.2024
Number of purchasers
6
Views
126
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Alekseev S. S. The Law. The Alphabet. The Theory. The Phylosophy. Comprehensive research experience. Moscow, 1999. 710 p. (In Russ.) 
2. Arkhipov S. I. Subject of law in the center of legal system. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2018, no. 7, pp. 13—23. (In Russ.) 
3. Bratus S. N. Subjects of civil law. Moscow, 1950. 368 p. (In Russ.) 
4. Kechekyan S. F. Legal relations in a socialist society. Moscow, 1958. 188 p. (In Russ.) 
5. Mamut L. S. Rights are acquired. In: E. A. Lukasheva, N. V. Kolotova (eds). Law and human rights in the context of globalization: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 22— 39. (In Russ.) 
6. Matuzov N. I. Legal system and personality. Saratov, 1987. 294 p. (In Russ.) 
7. Matuzov N. I., Malko A. V. Theory of state and law. Moscow, 2001. P. 766. (In Russ.) 
8. Mickiewicz A. V. Subjects of Soviet law. In: Mickiewicz A. V. Selected Works. Moscow, 2010. 304 p. (In Russ.) 
9. Mickiewicz A. V. Subjects of Soviet law. Moscow, 1962. 214 p. (In Russ.) 
10. Mutagirov D. Z. Human rights and freedoms. Moscow, 2006. 542 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Pashentsev D. A. Modernizing Legal Research Methodology in Conditions of the Formation of a New Scientific Rationality. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 8, pp. 5—13. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.090. 
12. Pashentsev D. A. Legal personality in the modern legal theory. In: A. V. Gabov, O. V. Gutnikov, O. A. Simvolokov et al. (eds). Legal personality: general theoretical, sectoral and international legal analysis: collection of conference materials to the XII Annual scientific reading for the memory of Professor S. N. Bratus. Moscow, 2017. 434 p. (In Russ.) 
13. Putilo N. V. To the Memory of A. V. Mitskevich — The Scientist, the Teacher, the Person. Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 5, pp. 151—153. (In Russ.) 
14. Putilo N. V., Pashentsev D. A. Issues of the Theory of Law in the Scientific Work of A. V. Mickiewicz (to the 100th Anniversary of the Scientist’s Birth). Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 6, Pp. 148—160. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.068. 
15. Sadikov O. N. S. N. Bratus: a scientist and a man. Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 6, pp. 158—161. (In Russ.) 
16. Isaev N. A., Chestnov I. L. (eds). Sociocultural antropology of law. St. Petersburg, 2014. 838 p. (In Russ.) 
17. Stepin V. S. Theoretical knowledge. Moscow, 2002. 744 p. (In Russ.) 
18. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1. 
19. Khabrieva T. Y. Technological Imperatives of the Modern World and the Role of Law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5—12. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jzsp.2023.001. 
20. Chestnov I. L. Subject of law as a legal narrative in the context of digitalization. Law and human rights in the modern world: trends, risks, development prospects: collection of materials of the International Scientific Conference in memory of Professor F. M. Rudinsky. 15 April 2021. Moscow, 2021. Pp. 185—188. (In Russ.) 
21. Ebzeev B. S. Man, people, state in the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2005. 574 p. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate