Strategic Constitutionalism and Constitutional Communication: Theoretical and Methodological, Legal and Informational Aspects
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Strategic Constitutionalism and Constitutional Communication: Theoretical and Methodological, Legal and Informational Aspects
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Igor A. Kravets 
Occupation: Acting Head of the Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Chief Researcher, Institute for Philosophy and Law
Affiliation: Novosibirsk State University
Address: Novosibirsk, Russia
Edition
Pages
5-22
Abstract

The article was p repared on the basis of the author's report at the scientific and methodological seminar of the school of Russian constitutionalism “Theory and Philosophy of Constitutionalism: Modern trends” (in memory of Academician O. E. Kutafin) (Kutafin Moscow State Law University, June 26, 2023). It examines communicative and strategic constitutionalism as theoretical models and constitutional-legal categories in modern multidimensional jurisprudence; scientific approaches to understanding popular and deliberative constitutionalism, the role of the principle of popular sovereignty and collective wisdom in modern constitutional law and in the era of digital democracy and information society; conceptual, constitutional and international legal aspects of the formation of a comprehensive institute of people's deliberative constitutionalism, the relationship between democracy and constitutionalism in the early 21st century, when various forms of participation are widely used citizens and the institution of the public in constitutional changes. The philosophical and legal foundations of the relationship between constitutionalism and democracy are critically evaluated from the standpoint of the policy of involvement and participation in constitutional changes; the problem of the geopolitical and international spread of various models of constitutionalism is revealed.

The purpose of the article is to reveal the significance and prospects for the development of an inclusive constitutional paradigm through the doctrines and practice of strategic and communicative constitutionalism. The participation of citizens, civil society institutions, professional and expert opinion is considered as an inclusive, humanistic and social basis in the structure of communicative constitutionalism and in the procedure of constitutional amendments.

The discursive approach and critical rationalism in legal research, methods of historical dialectics, constitutional hermeneutics and legal engineering are used, which allow us to reveal the legal and geopolitical nature of strategic constitutionalism, forms of citizen participation in communicative constitutionalism in the context of the formation of a multipolar world.

Conclusions: the doctrine of communicative and strategic constitutionalism creates an intellectual and normative-ethical basis for updating the constitutional policy of the state in the public political and legal spheres, expands the forms and methods of interaction between citizens and public authorities in the implementation of constituent power, deliberative and imperative procedures of constitutional changes.

Keywords
communicative constitutionalism, strategic jurisprudence, constituent power, strategic constitutionalism, popular initiatives, popular sovereignty, deliberative democracy, voting, collective wisdom, information society
Date of publication
12.04.2024
Number of purchasers
2
Views
103
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Addi L. Political Islam and democracy: the case of Algeria. In: Hadenius A. (ed.). Democracy's victory and crisis: Nobel symposium no. 93. Cambridge, 1997. Pp. 105—120. 
2. Buratti A. Western Constitutionalism. History, Institutions, Comparative Law. Cham, 2019. XI, 249 p. 
3. Chen A. H.-Y. The Reform and Renewal of China's Constitutional System (Zhongguo xianzhi zhi weixin中国宪制之维新). International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2018, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 728—730. 
4. Landemore H., Elster J. (eds). Collective Wisdom. Principles and Mechanisms. New York, 2012. 420 p. 
5. Colón-Ríos J. I. The end of the constitutionalism-democracy debate. Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers, 2011, vol. 1, iss. 4, pp. 1—37. 
6. Ginsburg T. (ed.). Comparative Constitutional Design (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy). Cambridge, 2012. XI, 393 p. 
7. Reuchamps M., Suiter J. (eds). Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe. Colchester, 2016. 196 p. 
8. Chen A. (ed.) Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy). Cambridge, 2014. 435 p. 9. Dworkin R. Constitutionalism and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 2—11. 
10. Elster J. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. New York, 2000. 324 p. 
11. Elster J. Ways of Constitution-making. In: Hadenius A. (ed.). Democracy's victory and crisis: Nobel symposium no. 93. Cambridge, 1997. Pp.123—142. 
12. Contiades X. (ed.). Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. Abingdon; New York, 2013. 488 p. 
13. Khabrieva T. Y., Klishas A. A. Thematic commentary to the Law of the Russian Federation on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ “On improving the regulation of certain issues of the organization and functioning of public authorities”. Moscow, 2020. 240 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Gebeye B. A. A Theory of African Constitutionalism. Oxford, 2021. 272 p. 
15. Habermas J. On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 12—20. 
16. He B. Socialist Constitutionalism in Contemporary China. In: M. W. Dowdle, M. A. Wilkinson (eds). Constitutionalism beyond Liberalism. Cambridge, 2017. Pp. 151—175. 
17. Contiades X., Fotiadou A. (eds). Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution. Abingdon; New York, 2017. 224 p. 
18. Betances E., Figueroa Ibarra C. (eds). Popular Sovereignty and Constituent Power in Latin America. Democracy from Below. New York, 2016. 208 p. 
19. Contiades X., Fotiadou A. (eds). Routledge Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Change. London, 2020. 468 p. 
20. Albert R. (ed.). The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments: History, Law, Politics. Oxford, 2023. 280 p. 
21. Levy R., Kong H., Orr G., King J. (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge, 2018. 384 p. 
22. Albert R., Contiades X., Fotiadou A. (eds). The Foundations and Traditions of Constitutional Amendment. Oxford, 2017. 416 p. 
23. Dann P., Riegner M., Bönnemann M. (eds). The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford, 2020. 320 p. 
24. Tong Zh. The Reform and Renewal of China's Constitutional System (Zhongguo xianzhi zhi weixin中国宪制之维新). Hong Kong, 2016. 338 p. 25. Bogdandy A. von, Ferrer Mac-Gregor E., Morales Antoniazzi M. et al. (eds). Transformative constitutionalism in Latin America: the emergence of a new Ius Commune. Oxford, 2017. 448 p. 
26. Baburin S. N. The Integration constitutionalism. Moscow, 2020. 264 p. (In Russ.) 
27. Vasileva T. A. IT as an instrument for democratization of parliamentary activities: Latin American practice. State and Law, 2023, no. 8, pp. 142—153. (In Russ.) 
28. Vinogradova E. V. The Constitutional Assembly of the Russian Federation. The untapped potential of constituent power. State and Law, 2022, no. 9, pp. 31—36. (In Russ.) 
29. Denisenko V. V., Trikoz E. N. Deliberativity and aleatory procedures as a legitimation of somatic human rights: experience of the Republic of Ireland and the Commonwealth of Australia. State and Law, 2023, no. 1, pp. 100—113. (In Russ.) 
30. Dobrynin N. M. The Russian constitutionalism in the framework of new geopolitical environment: milestones and vectors. State and Law, 2023, no. 9, pp. 31—43. (In Russ.) 
31. Nersesyants V. S. (ed.). History of bourgeois constitutionalism of the 19th century. Moscow, 1986. 279 p. (In Russ.) 
32. Nersesyants V. S. (ed.). History of bourgeois constitutionalism of the 17th—18th centuries. Moscow, 1983. 296 p. (In Russ.) 
33. Kravets I. A. Constitutionalism in Comparative Study and Teaching. Comparative Constitutional Review, 2009, no. 6(73), pp. 72—82. (In Russ.) 34. Kravets I. A. Principles of Russian constitutionalism and constitutionalization of the legal order. Moscow, 2017, 2020. 336 p. (In Russ.) 
35. Kravets I. A. Russian constitutionalism: problems of formation, development and implementation. St. Petersburg, 2004. 673 p. (In Russ.) 
36. Kravets I. Digital citizenship and constitutional challenges in the information and algorithmic society. Comparative Constitutional Review, 2023, no. 2(153), pp. 93—123. (In Russ.) 
37. Kutafin O. E. Russian constitutionalism. Moscow, 2008. 544 p. (In Russ.) 
38. Lazarev V. V. On the Integrative Understanding of Constitutionalism. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 39—53. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.050. 
39. Medushevskiy A. N. Democracy and authoritarianism: Russian constitutionalism in comparative perspective. Moscow, 1997. 650 p. (In Russ.) 
40. Khabrieva T. Y., Tikhomirov Yu. A. (eds). Scientific Concept of Development of the Russian Legislation. 7th ed. Moscow, 2015. 544 p. (In Russ.) 
41. Nersesyants V. S. Constitutionalism as a national ideology. In: Pivovarov Yu. S. (ed.). Constitutional and legal reform in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2000. Pp. 6—10. (In Russ.) 
42. Komarova V. V., Sadovnikova G. D. (eds). Modern Russian constitutionalism. Problems of formation and development prospects. Moscow, 2017. 448 p. (In Russ.) 
43. Komarova V. V., Rybakova O. S. (eds). Modern Russian constitutionalism: to the 85th anniversary of the birth of academician O. E. Kutafin. Moscow, 2023. 608 p. (In Russ.) 
44. Tikhomirov Yu. A., Nanba S. B. Trends of constitutional development of states in the contemporary world. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 21— 25. (In Russ.) 
45. Troitskaya A. A. Comparative method in the science of constitutional law. Moscow, 2020. 344 p. (In Russ.) 
46. Khabrieva T. Y., Andrichenko L. V. Constitutional Reforms in the Post-Soviet Space: Development Trends. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2017, no. 37, pp. 272—287. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate