Везде
Subordinate Regulatory Legal Acts as Sources of Criminal Proceedings
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Subordinate Regulatory Legal Acts as Sources of Criminal Proceedings
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.12737/jrp.2023.020
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexey Tsyretorov 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6036-5886
Occupation: Associate Professor at the Department of Criminal Procedure
Affiliation: East Siberian Institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
Address: Irkutsk, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 2
Pages
101-111
Abstract

The article examines the legal nature and place of subordinate normative legal acts in the system of criminal procedural law sources. Neither the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation nor judicial practice formally allow the regulation of criminal procedural relations by subordinate regulatory legal acts. Meanwhile, practice is in dire need of specific mechanisms for the implementation of certain norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Using the example of the procedure for considering applications and reports on a crime, the existing subordinate regulatory legal act containing a number of norms regulating certain issues in the field of consideration of reports and statements about crimes is analyzed, and its own law enforcement practice is given.

The purpose of the study is to establish the reason underlying the adoption of subordinate normative legal acts in the field of criminal proceedings, their legal nature and purpose.

Research methods: formal-legal, logical, comparative-legal.

Conclusion: subordinate normative legal acts as sources of criminal procedure law develop the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, eliminating various kinds of regulatory uncertainties, and can provide greater differentiation of legal impact in the area under study, embodying procedural economy — a principle that has not been reflected in current legislation, the ideas of which permeate many legislative decisions of recent years.

Keywords
criminal proceedings, efficiency of criminal proceedings, procedural economy, principles of criminal proceedings, subordinate rulemaking, filling legislative gaps, judicial practice, optimization of criminal proceedings, reporting of a crime, pre-investigation verification, verification of a crime report
Date of publication
20.02.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
229
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Belonosov V. O. Precedent in russian criminal proceeding. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2006, no. 10-3(50), pp. 98—104. (In Russ.) 
2.	Bugrova E. G. On the procedure of forming a judicial precedent as the source of the criminal procedural law of the Russian Federation. Yurist-“Pravoved”, 2020, no. 2(93), pp. 203—208. (In Russ.) 
3.	Constitution of the Russian Federation. Doctrinal commentary (by article). Ed. by Yu. A. Dmitriev; Yu. I. Skuratov. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2013. 688 p. (In Russ.) 
4.	Gadamer Kh.-G. Truth and Method. Ed. by B. N. Bessonov. Moscow, 1988. 704 p. (In Russ.)
5.	Gessen V. M. Exceptional position. St. Petersburg, 1908. 410 p. (In Russ.) 
6.	Hessick F. A., Hessick C. Nondelegation and Criminal Law (March 11, 2020). Virginia Law Review, 2020, vol. 107, pp. 281—345.
7.	Karapetov A. G. Economic analysis of law. Moscow, 2016. 528 p. (In Russ.) 
8.	Pokrovskiy I. A. The main problems of civil law. Petrograd, 1917. 328 p. (In Russ.) 
9.	Problems of the theory of law and legal realization: textbook. Ed. by L. T. Bakulina. Moscow, 2017. 384 p. (In Russ.) 
10.	Sidorenko M. V. Legal certainty of Russian criminal procedure law. Dr. diss. thesis. Krasnodar, 2017. 67 p. (In Russ.) 
11.	Whittington K. E., Iuliano J. The Myth of the Nondelegation Doctrine. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2017, vol. 165, pp. 379—431. 
12.	Zaytseva E. S. Establishment of the Limits of Legal Regulation in Law Enforcement. Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 59—70. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2021.045.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate