Везде
The Conditional and the Unconditional in Legal Science and Legal Education
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Conditional and the Unconditional in Legal Science and Legal Education
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/S160565900030394-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Galina Lanovaya 
ORCID: 0000-0002-6137-4300
Occupation: Professor, Department of Theory of State and Law
Affiliation: Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation named after V. Y. Kikot
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 No. 5
Pages
41-53
Abstract

The article deals with the issue of the ratio of the conditional and the unconditional in legal science and legal education. On the one hand, they have a desire to establish the identity of those mental structures that they represent with the objects, processes, properties they study, which gives them unconditional knowledge of the highest value. On the other hand, science and education develop by questioning existing knowledge, which implies recognition of the conditionality of the latter.

The purpose of the study is to differentiate the conditional and the unconditional in legal science and legal education, believing that this makes it possible to better understand them. To achieve this goal, the question of whether a legal dogma (dogma of law) is unconditional is being resolved; the properties of legal science and legal education are analyzed, which determine the ratio of the conditional and the unconditional moments in them; the search is carried out for what, being the unconditional in law, remains the unconditional in its reflections in legal science and legal education.

At all stages of the research, general scientific methods were used primarily: analysis, synthesis, induction, abstraction, reduction, ascent from the abstract to the concrete, etc.

According to the results of the study, it is stated that in legal science and legal education there are both the conditional and the unconditional, while the conditional prevails in them. The unconditional is absolute, self—evident, non-accidental, timeless, unchangeable, independent of anything; it is only the cultural conditionality of legal science and legal education, as well as the reproduction in them of those archetypes, attitudes, semantic ideas and basic values that make up the deep layer of the legal culture of society. In their conditionality with these components of legal culture, legal science and legal education appear to be an organic part of the legal culture of society.

Keywords
legal science, legal education, the unconditional and the conditional in legal science, the unconditional and the conditional in legal education, dogma of law, legal dogma, methodology of legal science, legal culture
Date of publication
17.05.2024
Number of purchasers
2
Views
90
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Tevris K., Aronson E. Mistakes that were made (but not by me). Why do we justify stupid beliefs, bad decisions and harmful actions. Moscow, 2012. 336 p. (In Russ.) 
2. Glukhareva L. I. Legal dogmatics and dogmatic thinking in the russian doctrine of law. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, 2017. no. 4(10), pp. 102—116. (In Russ.) 
3. Chestnov I. L. Legal dogmatics in the context of the post-classical paradigm. Kriminalist”, 2014, no. 2(15), pp. 80—82. (In Russ.) 
4. Sinyukov V. N. Theory of Law of S. S. Alekseev and Its Role in Developing Domestic Legal Doctrine. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 2, pp. 5—20. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.013. 
5. Globenko O. A. Tenets of law: transformation in the frame of modern realities of law order. Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika, 2018, no. 7(163), pp. 28—32. (In Russ.) 
6. Chuvalnikova A. S. Theory, dogma and history of law: problems of methodology. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal konstitutsionnogo i gosudarstvennogo prava, 2018, no. 1, pp. 126— 127. (In Russ.) 
7. Shundikov K. V. Reconciliation As a Means of Positiv Legal Responsibility Implementing. Science Vector of Togliatti State University. Series: Legal Sciences, 2014, no. 4, pp. 123—125. (In Russ.) 
8. Alekseev S. S. Collected works. Vol. 6. Moscow, 2010. 558 p. (In Russ.) 
9. Mikhailov A. M. The genesis of continental legal dogmatics. Moscow, 2012. 496 p. (In Russ.) 
10. Zaitsev O. V. Modern problems of the doctrine of civil law. Moscow, 2017. 88 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Malakhov V. P. Myths of modern general legal theory. Moscow, 2013. 151 p. (In Russ.) 
12. Pinker S. Rationality: What is it, why do we lack it and why is it important. Moscow, 2023. 386 p. (In Russ.) 
13. Antonyan Yu.M. A hard way of comprehending the criminal. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O. E. Kutafina (MGYuA), 2017, no. 7, pp. 24—36. (In Russ.) 
14. Glukhareva L. I. Mythological features of doctrinal legal thinking. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2019, vol. 6, no. 3(20), pp. 79—86. (In Russ.) 15. Vostroknutov V. A. Mythological element in modern public legal consciousness. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2016. 29 p. (In Russ.) 
16. Malko A. V., Nyrkov V. V. Incentive law sanctions and positive legal responsibility: arguments for need of allocation and joint theoretical research. Vektor nauki Tol'yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, 2016, no. 1 (24), pp. 50—58. (In Russ.) 
17. Malko A. V., Nyrkov V. V., Shundikov K. V. Theory of state and law. Moscow, 2024. 432 p. (In Russ.). 
18. Timoshina E. V. The power of law: legal principles as categorical norms. In: Denisenko V. V. Law and power: basic models of interaction in a multipolar world: proceedings of the International scientific conference, Voronezh, 2—3 June 2017. Voronezh, 2017. Pp. 38—46. (In Russ.) 
19. Irkhin I. V. Discussion on the nature of the principles of law (legal principles) in the context of convergence of legal systems. Lex russica, 2020, vol. 73, no. 4(161), pp. 117—129. (In Russ.) 
20. Smirnov D. A. About concept of the principles of the right. Obshchestvo i pravo, 2012, no. 4(41), pp. 29—37. (In Russ.) 
21. Malakhov V. P., Eriashvili N. D. Methodological and ideological problems of modern legal theory. Moscow, 2011. 431 p. (In Russ.) 
22. Albov A. P. Law and legal culture as a unity of conditional and unconditional. Uchenye trudy Rossiyskoy akademii advokatury i notariata, 2022, no. 3(66), pp. 9—13. (In Russ.) 
23. Utkin G. N. Unconditional and conditional in law: categorical analysis. Law and the state: XXI century — the century of changes. Moscow, 2012. Pp. 19—33. (In Russ.) 
24. Perfiliev V. V., Orlov K. A. The main characteristics of the nature of law: a general theoretical aspect. Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti, 2020, no. 3, pp. 31—37. (In Russ.) 
25. Popov A. A. Personal context of legal reality: dialectics of proper and possible. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve, 2016, no. 4, pp. 92—95. (In Russ.) 
26. Malakhov V. P. Philosophy of law. Moscow, 2002. 448 p. (In Russ.) 
27. Maltsev G. V. Cultural traditions of law. Moscow, 2016. 608 p. (In Russ.) 28. Sinyukov V. N. The Russian legal system. Introduction to general theory. Moscow, 2014. 672 p. (In Russ.) 
29. Sorokin V. V. The concept and essence of law in the spiritual culture of Russia. Moscow, 2007. 456 p. (In Russ.) 
30. Kostina A. V. Sociocultural conditionality of cognition: ideology and science. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 2022, vol. 11, no. 5A, pp. 104—113. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate