Везде
On the Epistemological Foundations and Issues of the Modern Legal Understanding Doctrine
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
On the Epistemological Foundations and Issues of the Modern Legal Understanding Doctrine
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ainur Gilmullin 
ORCID: 0000-0002-9842-8587
Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Associate Professor, Department of Theory and History of State and Law, KFU
Affiliation: Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 No. 7
Pages
19-31
Abstract

This article is devoted to a comprehensive analysis and understanding of existing epistemological approaches to the study of legal understanding. The paper reveals modern doctrinal concepts in relation to the definition of the category “legal understanding”, its ontological, axiological and problematic aspects, provides and critically analyzes some methodological approaches to the organization of the content of the legal understanding doctrine. In particular, the author focuses on the theoretical characteristics of such ontological categories of legal understanding as the essence and definition of the concept of law, considered as its internal content and complete (idealized) form, their axiological problem and epistemological positioning in the structure of modern legal knowledge. From the standpoint of general scientific methods and requirements, the idea of the inadmissibility of ignoring the objective system- and structure-forming properties of these ontological categories, their universal (global) significance and the need to exclude their multivariance (multiplicity) is substantiated. It is concluded that the theory of legal understanding represents the fundamental direction of legal science for developing reliable, objective, and substantiated knowledge about the essence and understanding of law. The theory of legal understanding should be determined by specific (strict) requirements of scientific rationality, such as finding objective laws of change and development of law, establishing its essence, creating an idealized theoretical construct (concept definition) of law, and development of scientific foresight and forecasting of the future of law, etc.

Keywords
legal understanding, essence of law, legal doctrine, scientific rationality, legal methodology, epistemology of law
Date of publication
17.07.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
29
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1700 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Ford St. The American Legal System. Its Dynamic and Limits. St. Paul, 1984. 
2. Antonov M. V., Polyakov A. V. Law and legal cultures in the XXI century: distinction and unity (XXII World congress of the International association of the philosophy of law and social philosophy). Pravovedenie, 2008, no. 2, pp. 124—147. (In Russ.) 
3. Baytin M. I. The essence of the law (Modern normative understanding of law on the verge of two centuries). Saratov, 2001. 416 p. (In Russ.) 
4. Varlamova N. V. The typology of legal understanding and current trends in the development of the theory of law. Moscow, 2010. 136 p. (In Russ.) 
5. Vlasenko N. A. Efficiency of Understanding of Law in the Modern Legal Science. Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 4, pp. 5—18. (In Russ.) 
6. Hegel G. W. F. Encyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1974. 452 p. (In Russ.) 
7. Zorkin V. D. Civilization of Law and Development of Russia. Moscow, 2015. 319 p. (In Russ.) 
8. Zorkin V. D. Constitutional and legal development of Russia. Moscow, 2011. 720 p. (In Russ.) 
9. Kant I. Zum ewigen Frieden. In: Kant I. Collected Works. Vol. 6. Moscow, 1966. Pp. 258— 309. (In Russ.) 
10. Kulikov E. A. Essays on the history and methodology of legal science: the Eurasian paradigm. Barnaul, 2020. 180 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Lapaeva V. V. Types of legal understanding: legal theory and practice. Moscow, 2012. 577 p. (In Russ.) 
12. Lukasheva E. A. On the issue of legal understanding: Main conceptions of law and state in modern Russia (On the “round table” materials in the Center of theory and history of law and state of the Institute of state and law of the Russian academy of sciences). State and Law, 2003, no. 5, pp. 5—33. (In Russ.) 
13. Maltsev G. V. Understanding the law. Approaches and problems. Moscow, 1999. 419 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Marx K., Engels F. Collected Works. Vol. 25. Part 2. Moscow, 1962. 551 p. (In Russ.) 
15. Marchenko M. N., Deryabina E. M. Law studies. Moscow, 2004. 416 p. (In Russ.) 
16. Marchenko M. N. Modern legal understanding. Moscow, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.) 
17. Nersesyants V. S. The general theory of law and the state. Moscow, 2015. 560 p. (In Russ.) 
18. Ol P. A. Legal understanding: from pluralism to duality. St. Petersburg, 2005. 241 p. (In Russ.) 
19. Stepin V. S. Theoretical Knowledge. Moscow, 2003. 744 p. (In Russ.) 
20. Stepin V. S. Philosophy of science. Common problems. Moscow, 2006. 384 p. (In Russ.) 
21. Fridmen L. American Law: An Introduction. Moscow, 1992. 286 p. (In Russ.) 
22. Hart H. L. A. The Concept of Law. St. Petersburg, 2007. 302 p. (In Russ.) 
23. Chestnov I. L. History and Methodology of Legal Science. Moscow, 2018. 283 p. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate