Везде
Certain Methodological Aspects of Constitutional Control Models Construction
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Certain Methodological Aspects of Constitutional Control Models Construction
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Rovshan Ismailov 
Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Law), Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Affiliation: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan
Edition
Volume 28 No. 7
Pages
32-43
Abstract

The author of the article analyzes doctrinal approaches to the formation of models of constitutional control, identifies the main criteria and principles for the formation of such models, which makes it possible to make legal modeling more accurate. The possibility of applying natural science approaches to constitutional and legal modeling is considered, as well as the models of constitutional control are classified into traditional and other models that allow to more accurately determine the place of a particular model of constitutional control in the system. The principles that can be applied in the study of models of constitutional control are analyzed, in particular, the principle of exhaustive completeness of the study and the principle of mutual exclusion. The first principle assumes rigor in defining the modeling criteria and, accordingly, the scope of the study, the second principle implies that the criteria underlying one model cannot characterize another. The implementation of modeling in relation to constitutional control is most effective in the presence of a wide range of criteria, which makes it possible to reflect the unique characteristics inherent in various control systems. The goals and objectives of the research were the search for criteria for the formation of models of constitutional control, ways to transform the list of modeling criteria from a traditional closed list into a flexible one capable of reflecting the existing features of individual systems of constitutional control, the study of the doctrinal foundations of model formation, including on the basis of natural science knowledge and modeling methodology. During the research, methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative legal and formal legal methods, modeling methods, classification, etc. were applied.

Keywords
constitutional control, constitutional law, legal models, modeling, specific constitutional control, abstract constitutional control, principles, doctrine
Date of publication
17.07.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
29
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1700 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Ackrén M. Conditions for Different Autonomy Regimes in the World: A Fuzzy-Set Application. Åbo, 2009. 
2. Belohlávek R., Dauben J., Klir G. Fuzzy Logic and Mathematics: A Historical Perspective. Oxford, 2017. 
3. Brennan T. Classification: An Overview of Selected Methodological Issues. Crime and Justice. A Review of Research, 1987, vol. 9. 4. Calamandrei P. La illegittimità costituzionale delle leggi nel processo civile. Padova, 1950. 
5. Constantinesco V., Pierré-Caps S. Droit constitutionnel. Paris, 2007. 
6. Favoreu L. American and European Models of Constitutional Justice. In: Clark D. S. (ed.). Comparative and Private International Law: Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman on his Seventieth Birthday. Berlin, 1990. 
7. Favoreu L. et al. Droit constitutionnel. 21e éd. Paris, 2019. 
8. Favoreu L. Modèle européen et modèle américain de justice constitutionnelle. Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle. 1990. 4-1988. 
9. Fromont M. La justice constitutionnelle dans le monde. Paris, 1996. 
10. García Belaunde D. Derecho procesal constitucional. Trujillo, 1998. 
11. Mahmood C., Armstrong S. Do Ethnic Groups Exist? A Cognitive Perspective on the Concept of Cultures. Ethnology, 1992, vol. 31. 
12. Needham R. Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences. Man, 1975, vol. 3. 
13. Nicolini M. I governi legislatori. DPCE Online, 2021, vol. 50. 
14. Pegoraro L. Approccio classificatorio “fuzzy” ed elementi determinanti nel diritto costituzionale comparato. L’eredità di Uberto Scarpelli. Torino, 2014. 
15. Ponthoreau M.-C. Droit(s) constitutionnel(s) comparé(s). Paris, 2021. 
16. Ruggeri A., Spadaro A. Lineamenti di giustizia costituzionale. Torino, 2019. 
17. Sokal R., Sneath P. Principles of numerical taxonomy. London, 1963. 
18. Stone Sweet A., Shapiro M. Abstract and Concrete Review in the United States. On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford, 2002. 
19. Troper M. Pour une théorie juridique de l’État. Paris, 1994. 
20. Tusseau G. Au-delà des “modèles” de justice constitutionnelle, pour un comparatisme pragmatiste. Metodologia della comparazione. Lo studio dei sistemi giudiziari nel contesto euroamericano. Bologna, 2014. 
21. Tusseau G. Contre les “modèles” de justice constitutionnelle. Bologne, 2009. 
22. Tusseau G. Sur le métalangage du comparatiste. De la prétention à la neutralité à l’engagement pragmatiste. Revus, 2013, no. 21. 
23. Varenn F. Theorie, realite, modele. Epistemologie des theories et des modeles face au realisme dans les sciences. Paris, 2012. 
24. Weber A. Notes sur la justice constitutionnelle comparée: convergences et divergences. Annuaire international de justice constitutionnelle, 2004. 19-2003. 
25. Wróblewski J. The judicial application of law. Dordrecht, 1992. 
26. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 1965, vol. 8, no. 3. 
27. Bergel J.-L. Théorie générale du droit. Transl. from French. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.) 
28. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. Transl. by L. Dobroselsky. Moscow, 2018. (In Russ.) 
29. Vitruvius M. De architectura libri decem. Transl. by F. Petrovsky. Moscow, 1936. (In Russ.) 
30. Vitruk N. V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess. Moscow, 2010. 
31. Vygotskiy L. S. Myshlenie i rech’: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow; Leningrad, 1934. 
32. Zadeh L. A. Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing, 2015, vol. 10, no. 1. (In Russ.)
33. Kleyn L. S. Arkheologicheskaya tipologiya. Leningrad, 1991. 
34. Miryasheva E. V., Pavlikov S. G., Safonov V. E. Sudebnyy konstitutsionnyy kontrol’ v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: istoriya i sovremennost’. Moscow, 2015. 
35. Morozov K. E. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie v nauchnom poznanii. Moscow, 1969. 
36. Novak V., Perfil’eva I., Mochkorzh I. Matematicheskie printsipy nechetkoy logiki. Moscow, 2006. 
37. Opalev R. O. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave. Moscow, 2008. 
38. Strel’nikov K. A. K voprosu o logicheskikh problemakh sovremennogo prava. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2009, no. 8. 
39. Shtoff V. A. Modelirovanie i filosofiya. Moscow; Leningrad, 1966. 
40. Yudin Yu. A., Shulzhenko Yu. L. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v federativnom gosudarstve (sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie). Moscow, 2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate