Везде
On a Possibility of Copyright Protection of Objects Generated by Artificial Intelligence Systems
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
On a Possibility of Copyright Protection of Objects Generated by Artificial Intelligence Systems
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anton Gurko 
ORCID: 0000-0002-0043-8219
Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Law), Senior Lecturer, Department of Civil Law Disciplines, Higher School of Law, PRUE
Affiliation: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 No. 7
Pages
64-77
Abstract

In recent years, many computer programs have appeared that operate on the AI basis, which are designed to generate various types of content and are distributed to a wide range of users. Therefore, more and more AI objects, similar in their characteristics to protected results of intellectual activity, are being distributed on the Internet. The fact that such objects are generated automatically by a computer program does not allow them to be subject to legal protection in accordance with Part 4 of the Russian Civil Code due to the lack of authors. At the same time, significant funds are being invested in the creation of new AI systems, which determines the need to protect the interests of persons involved in the AI creation and use. At the same time, there is no consensus in the scientific literature about the possibility or impossibility of protecting such objects, as well as the principles and contours of their legal protection. In this regard, the author conducted a study in order to formulate the basic principles of legal protection of objects generated by AI systems. To achieve this goal, the author has formulated the following tasks: to summarize existing approaches to solving the issue of legal protection of AI objects, to identify their shortcomings, to determine the presence or absence of elements of human creativity in working with artificial intelligence systems, to determine the optimal regime for the protection of AI objects. The study was conducted using general scientific methods of cognition, as well as methods of literal interpretation of legal norms, a predictive method and a method of legal modeling. The author comes to the conclusion that there are signs of creativity in human activities when working with AI, which makes it possible to recognize users of such systems as the authors of the objects they generate in accordance with the presumption of authorship enshrined in legislation.

Keywords
intellectual property, artificial intelligence, author of the result of intellectual activity, results of intellectual activity, copyright
Date of publication
17.07.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
27
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1700 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bayamlioglu E. Intelligent Agents and Their Legal Status: An Essay on Artificial Intelligence and Personality. Ankara Bar Review, 2008, no. 1, pp. 46—54. 
2. Krausova A. Intersections Between Law and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Computer, 2017, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55—68. 
3. Solaiman S. M. Legal Personality of Robots, Corporations, Idols and Chimpanzees: a Quest for Legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2017, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 155—179. 
4. Weitzenboeck E. M. Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2001, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 204—234. 
5. Vitko V. S. Analysis of Scientific Views of Authorship and Right for Results of AI Activity. Intellectual property. Copyright and Related Rights, 2019, no. 2, pp. 5—20. (In Russ.) 
6. Gurko A. Artificial Intelligence and Copyright: Looking to the Future. Intellectual property. Copyright and Related Rights, 2017, no. 12, pp. 7—18. (In Russ.) 
7. Dremlyuga R. I., Dremlyuga O. A. Artificial Intelligence — a Legal Person: the Arguments For and Against. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’, 2019, no. 2, pp. 120—125. (In Russ.) 
8. Ivliev G. P., Egorova M. A.Legal Issues of the Legal Status of Artificial Intelligence and Products Created by Artificial Intelligence Systems. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 32—46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.060. 
9. Kalyatin V. O. Establishing of Subject of Rights of Intellectual Property Created with Use of Artificial Intelligence. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2022, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 24—50. (In Russ.) 
10. Morkhat P. M. Legal Personality of Artificial Intelligence Units. Civil Research. Moscow, 2018. 113 p. (In Russ.) 
11. Nazarov N. Acknowledging Authorship for Results of Intellectual Activity Created by AI. Intellectual property. Copyright and Related Rights, 2020, no. 3, pp. 53—62. (In Russ.) 
12. Orlova T. E. Copyright on the Results of Artificial Intelligence Activity. Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii, 2022, no. 21, pp. 204—221. (In Russ.) 
13. Rozhkova M. A. Will Artificial Intelligence Become an Independent Subject of Law? Khozyaystvo i pravo, 2021, no. 6(533), pp. 14—22. 
14. Sinelnikova V. N., Revinskiy O. V. Rights to the Results of Artificial Intellect. Kopirayt, 2017, no. 4, pp. 17—27. (In Russ.) 
15. Kharitonova Yu. S., Savina V. S. Artificial Intelligence Technology and Law: Challenges of our Time. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2020, no. 3, pp. 524—549. (In Russ.) 
16. Yastrebov O. A. The Legal Capacity of Electronic Persons: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 36—55. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate