Везде
Doctrinal Aspects of Data Legal Regimes in the Conditions of Development of Big Data Technologies
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Doctrinal Aspects of Data Legal Regimes in the Conditions of Development of Big Data Technologies
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Eleonora Leskina 
ORCID: 0000-0001-8772-5730
Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Department of Information Law and Digital Technologies, Saratov State Law Academy
Affiliation: Saratov State Law Academy, Saratov, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 No. 7
Pages
122-136
Abstract

The article examines the concept, features, essence of the data legal regime, as well as trends in the legislator’s approaches in this area in connection with the development of big data technology. Theoretical foundations and unity in the understanding of legal terms and constructions lead to holistic, effective legal regulation. The state’s attention in recent years has been aimed at establishing such a balance in the field of ensuring the development of digital technologies, in which digital and technological sovereignty would be achieved, as well as human rights would be ensured. The legal regime of data in such conditions determines the prospects for the development of most technologies. The purpose of the article is to identify such doctrinal foundations of legal data regimes as the concept, structure, types, as well as to study the features of the legal regime of big data. The methods of empirical (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, systematization) and theoretical (methods of construction and research of the object of research, methods of construction and justification of theoretical knowledge) levels are used in the work. Various approaches to understanding the essence of the legal regime are considered, as a result of which the definition of the concept of “data legal regime” is formulated and its features are highlighted. An analysis of the types of legal data regime is presented. The general data regime is considered, the need for its development in relation to non-personal data is noted. The definition of the concept of “personal data legal regime” is given. Attention is drawn to the variety of types of personal data legal regimes, the features of the general personal data regime and its differences from the general information legal regime are considered. The experimental data legal regime and the depersonalized data legal regime, the issues of formation of the data civil legal regime are considered. The goals and objectives of these legal regimes, trends in the transformation of the content of the legal regimes of personal data are analyzed. It is concluded that there is a need to maintain a balance between the right to information and the principle of human privacy, protection of confidentiality and promotion of innovation. It is noted that there is no need to form a separate legal regime for Big Data. A set of rules regarding other legal data regimes should eliminate conflicts and promote the effective development and implementation of big data technologies.

Keywords
big data, legal regime, personal data, depersonalization, experiment, experimental legal regime, information technology, artificial intelligence
Date of publication
17.07.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
27
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1700 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Perevalov V. D., Gribanov D. V. Economic and legal grounds for innovation: the problem of correlation. State and Law, 2011, no. 12, pp. 48—57. (In Russ.) 
2. Trofimov V. V. Remedial function of law policy in the sphere of innovation: the theoretical definition and the problems of realization. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2015, no. 2, pp. 51—55. (In Russ.) 
3. Mokhov A. A. The quality of legal institutions and economic growth in Russia. Predprinimatel’skoe pravo. Prilozhenie, 2012, no. 2. (In Russ.) 
4. Matuzov N. I., Malko A. V. Political and legal regimes: current aspects. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 1997, no. 1, pp. 64—71. (In Russ.) 
5. Alekseev S. S. General theory of law. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2011. 568 p. (In Russ.) 6. Alekseev S. S. General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law. Moscow, 1989. 288 p. (In Russ.) 
7. Morozova L. A. Constitutional regulation in the USSR. Moscow, 1985. 143 p. (In Russ.) 
8. Gorlenko V. A. Legal regulation regime (theoretical and applied aspect). Cand. diss. thesis. St. Petersburg, 2002. 28 p. (In Russ.) 
9. Matuzov N. I., Malko A. V. Legal regimes: questions of theory and practice. Izvestiya vuzov. Pravovedenie, 1996, no. 1, pp. 1-29. (In Russ.) 
10. Malko A. V., Rodionov O. S. Legal regimes under Russian legislation. Journal of Russian Law, 2001, no. 9, pp. 19—25. (In Russ.) 
11. Belyaeva G. S. Legal regime: general theoretical research. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2013. 44 p. (In Russ.) 
12. Babaev V. K., Baranov V. M., Goyman V. I. Dictionary of categories and concepts of general theory of law. Nizhny Novgorod, 1992. 98 p. (In Russ.) 
13. Bakhrakh D. N. Administrative Law. Moscow, 1996. 368 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Sadikov O. N. (ed.). Civil Law. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2007. 493 p. (In Russ.) 
15. Sentchishchev V. I. Public reglamentation of title of real property and of legal acts involving it. Journal of Russian Law. 1999, no. 12, pp. 111—119. (In Russ.) 
16. Tereshchenko L. K. Legal regime of information. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2011. 54 p. (In Russ.) 
17. Tereshchenko L. K. Legal basis of special information regimes. Yuridicheskiy konsul’tant, 2007, no. 9, pp. 18-27. (In Russ.) 
18. Rodionov O. S. The mechanism for establishing legal regimes by Russian legislation. Cand. diss. Saratov, 2001. 157 p. (In Russ.) 
19. Kuznetsov P. U. Legal regime as a category and method of information law. In: Bachilo I. L. (ed.). Legal concepts and categories in the context of information law: materials of the theoretical seminar on information law. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 12—32. (In Russ.) 
20. Antopolskiy A. A. Legal regulation of restricted access information in the field of public administration. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2004. 289 p. (In Russ.) 
21. Ponomareva Yu. V. Legal regime of official secrets. Cand. diss. Chelyabinsk, 2018. 253 p. (In Russ.) 22. Ogorodov D. V. Legal relations in the information sphere. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2002. 243 p. (In Russ.) 
23. Loshkarev A. V. Legal guarantees: theoretical problems of definition and classification. Cand. diss. thesis. Krasnodar, 2009. 
27 p. (In Russ.) 
24. Channov S. E. Information law of Russia. Moscow, 2004. 224 p. (In Russ.) 
25. Smirnov D. A. On some issues of the relationship between legislation on state secrets and labor legislation. Vestnik trudovogo prava i prava sotsial’nogo obespecheniya, 2010, no. 5(5), pp. 82—92. (In Russ.) 
26. Afzaletdinova G. Kh. Exceptional regimes in Russian law. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2016, 202 p. (In Russ.) 
27. Mokhov A. A. The experimental legal regime as a special legal regime for drivers of innovation-based economy. Yurist, 2019, no. 8, pp. 19—25. (In Russ.) 
28. Belitskaya A. V. Legal environment of developing innovative activity in the Russian Federation. Zakonodatel’stvo, 2012, no. 11, pp. 31—39. (In Russ.) 
29. Vasilenko O. V. The problems of definition “innovation” and “innovation activity” in legal documents. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Yurisprudentsiya, 2015, no. 1, pp. 22—30. (In Russ.) 
30. Efimtseva T. V. Innovative legal relations: concept, structure, types. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 1, pp. 38—39. (In Russ.) 
31. Ivanova L. N., Terskaya G. A. Spots growth and growth drivers: the question of the contents concepts. Zhurnal institutsional’nykh issledovaniy, 2015, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120—133. (In Russ.) 
32. Kostin K. B. The growth drivers for global economics. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, 2017, no. 6, pp. 19—24. (In Russ.) 
33. Lapina M. A., Baranov V. A. (eds). Departmental rule-making (theory and practice of application). Moscow, 2014. 240 p. (In Russ.) 
34. Cherepanova E. V. Legal experiment as a mechanism for testing technologies of electronic trade. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo, 2020, no. 6, pp. 38—41. (In Russ.) 
35. Frolov D. P., Lavrenteva A. V. Digital economy as an subject of regulation: the institutional theory perspective. Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika, 2019, vol. 18, no. 11(494), pp. 2044— 2058. (In Russ.) 
36. Tolmachevets Yu. A., Lisovskiy M. I. The promising opportunities and benefits of the implementation of regulatory sandbox. Ekonomika i sotsium, 2019, no. 1-1(56), pp. 934—938. (In Russ.) 
37. Sinyukov V. N., Egorova M. A. (eds). Legal regulation of the digital economy in modern conditions of development of high-tech business in the national and global context. Moscow, 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.) 
38. Arkhipov V. V. Internet law. Moscow, 2016. 249 p. (In Russ.) 
39. Bachilo I. L. Informational Law. 5th ed. Moscow, 2020. 419 p. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate