Везде
The Rule-Making: From Juridical Technique to Legal Architecture and Engineering
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Rule-Making: From Juridical Technique to Legal Architecture and Engineering
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/S160565900031148-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Evgenia E. Frolova 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1852-0085
Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Law), Prof., Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure and Private International Law, RUDN University
Affiliation: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Moscow, Russia
Igor P. Kozhokar
Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Law), Leading Researcher, Sector of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law, ISL RAS
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Edition
Volume 28 Issue 8
Pages
5-24
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the possibilities and prospects of the transition from theoretical and legal concepts of legal technique and technology to the doctrine of legal architecture and engineering in the field of rule-making. Such a transition is due to the intensive process of digitalization of public relations, including in the field of law-making, which, changing traditional forms of rule-making and translating them into digital reality, requires the development of an appropriate legal doctrine. A theoretical consideration of the rule-making process as legal engineering will not only significantly update its legal doctrine, but also see and explain the qualitative changes in it due to the possibilities of using innovative technologies. The aim is to form a theoretical and legal understanding of normative legal engineering as a result of the evolution of legal technology, legal technology and legal engineering, taking into account the availability of modern digital space and innovative tools. The research methods are based on a general scientific dialectical methodology that allows us to consider legal engineering in rulemaking in its dynamics and interaction with related phenomena (engineering, technology, engineering). The methods of formal and dialectical logic, ascent from the concrete to the abstract, from the abstract to the concrete, as well as such categories of dialectics as cause and effect, possibility and reality are used. Private scientific methods of cognition (historicallegal, formal-legal, comparative-legal) are applied. Results: a study of the evolution of the development of the doctrine of legal technique and technology has shown that it currently needs a new perspective and perspective to describe the process of rulemaking in modern digital reality. Conclusions: digitalization and informatization of public relations and social communications will inevitably change all spheres of human activity, including rule-making. The concept of legal engineering will allow us to describe the features of "electronic" rule-making, and at a practical level — to accompany rule-making at all stages — from the formation of the “idea of the law” to its recognition as invalid using modern technologies and processes (automation, robotization, artificial intelligence, etc.).

Keywords
juridical technique, juridical technology, legal architecture, legal engineering, legislative process, rule-making, law-making, digitalization of public relations
Date of publication
22.08.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
232
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1700 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Malko A. V., Kostenko M. A. The Place and the Role of Legal Technology in Law-Making Policy of Modern Russia. Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 4, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.) 
2. Kruzhalova A. V. Innovatsionnye sredstva fiksatsii informatsii v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve. Cand. diss. thesis. Saratov, 2022. 
3. Rusakova E. P. Vozdeystvie tsifrovizatsii na grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii i za rubezhom: opyt Kitaya, Indii, Singapura, Evropeyskogo Soyuza, SShA, YuAR i nekotorykh drugikh stran. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2022. 
4. Jhering R. Legal technique. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.) 
5. Khabrieva T. Y., Vlasenko N. A. (eds). Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: uchebnoe posobie po podgotovke zakonoproektov i inykh normativnykh pravovykh aktov organami ispolnitel’noy vlasti. Moscow, 2009. 
6. Nersesyants V. S. General Theory of State and Law. Moscow, 1999. (In Russ.) 
7. Pigolkin A. S., Dmitriev Yu.A. (eds). Theory of State and Law. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.) 
8. Chigidin B. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika rossiyskogo zakonodatel’stva. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2002. 
9. Braude I. L. Izbrannoe: Ocherki zakonodatel’noy tekhniki. Nekotorye voprosy sistemy sovetskogo prava. Moscow, 2010. 
10. Alekseev S. S. Problems of the theory of law. In: Alekseev S. S. Collected Works. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.) 
11. Panko K. K. Osnovy zakonodatel’noy tekhniki v ugolovnom prave Rossii: teoriya i zakonodatel’naya praktika. Dr. diss. thesis. Saratov, 2006. 
12. Davydova M. L. Teoreticheskie problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya yuridicheskoy tekhniki v otechestvennoy teorii prava. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5: Yurisprudentsiya, 2007, no. 9. 
13. Davydova M. L. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy ponyatiya i sostava yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Dr. diss. thesis. Volgograd, 2010. 
14. Shved E. N. Ponyatie pravotvorcheskoy tekhniki kak otdel’nogo vida yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Pravo.by, 2019, no. 3 (59). 
15. Tenetko A. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika pravoprimenitel’nykh aktov. Cand. diss. Ekaterinburg, 1999. 
16. Skryabina O. G. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: sovremennye metodologicheskie podkhody. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. Gosudarstvo i pravo: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Seriya “Yuridicheskie nauki”, 2011, no. 1(1). 
17. Zykova S. V. Interpretatsionnaya tekhnika: soderzhanie i mesto v sisteme yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2022, no. 8. 
18. Kozhokar I. P., Rusakova E. P. Law-implementing legal engineering and digital justice. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2023, no. 1(59). (In Russ.) 
19. Boldyrev S. N. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika i zakonodatel’naya tekhnika: problemy sootnosheniya. Filosofiya prava, 2015, no. 1. 
20. Krasavchikov O. A. Sovetskaya nauka grazhdanskogo prava: ponyatie, predmet, sostav i sistema. Sverdlovsk, 1961. 
21. Pronina M. P. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika v ugolovnom zakonodatel’stve: teoretikoprikladnoe issledovanie. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2022. 
22. Lazareva O. V., Sukhova N. I. Legal technique. Saratov, 2015. (In Russ.) 
23. Korzh P. A. Legal technique. Perm’, 2014. (In Russ.) 
24. Pavlova K. E. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika kak atribut normotvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti (na primere organov vnutrennikh del). Cand. diss. thesis. Belgorod, 2016. 
25. Savchenko L. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika v pravotvorchestve sub”ekta Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2004. 
26. Dolotova D. V. Tekhnika i tekhnologiya pravovykh aktov: na primere pravovykh aktov, izdavaemykh v ugolovno-ispolnitel’noy sisteme. Cand. diss. thesis. Vladimir, 2012. 
27. Loginov A. S. Pravoprimenitel’naya tekhnika. Cand. diss. thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 2011. 
28. Plotnitskiy A. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika i ee ispol’zovanie v ugolovno-protsessual’nom normotvorchestve. Cand. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2008. 
29. Fokina S. P., Zvereva E. B. Lingvostilisticheskie kriterii sostavleniya zakonodatel’nykh dokumentov v kontekste sovershenstvovaniya yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 2019, no. 1(50). 
30. Nashits A. Pravotvorchestvo: teoriya i zakonodatel’naya tekhnika. Moscow, 1974. 
31. Davydova M. L. Legal technique: problems of theory and methodology. Volgograd, 2009. (In Russ.) 
32. Veprev R. I. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika v sfere chastnogo prava. Pravo i prava cheloveka v sovremennom mire: tendentsii, riski, perspektivy razvitiya. Saratov, 2020. 
33. Kukhta A. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika i tekhnika dokazyvaniya po ugolovnym delam. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2007, no. 1. 
34. Boldyrev S. N., Kazaryan K. V. Normativnoe tolkovanie kak sredstvo yuridicheskoy tekhniki i ego rol’ v modernizatsii rossiyskogo prava. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravlenie, 2010, no. 5(5). 
35. Muromtsev G. I. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: nekotorye aspekty soderzhaniya ponyatiya. In: Baranov V. M. (ed.). Problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. 
36. Bachernikhina M. V. Tekhnika ustanovleniya fakticheskikh obstoyatel’stv yuridicheskogo dela. Cand. diss. thesis. Vladimir, 2011. 
37. Baranov V. M. (ed.). Juridical techniques. Nizhny Novgorod, 2015. (In Russ.) 
38. Kashanina T. V. Legal technique. Moscow, 2017. (In Russ.) 
39. Osintsev D. V. Yuridicheskie tekhniki i yuridicheskie tekhnologii: ocherk al’ternativnogo pravoponimaniya. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2018, no. 4. 
40. Vlasenko N. A. Zakonodatel’naya tekhnologiya (teoriya, opyt, pravila). Irkutsk, 2001. 
41. Voevodin L. D. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika v konstitutsionnom prave. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo, 1997, no. 3. 
42. Baranov V. M. (ed.). Problems of legal technique. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. (In Russ.) 
43. Kartashov V. N. Yuridicheskaya tekhnologiya ili yuridicheskaya tekhnika? Nekotorye metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2007, no. 1. 
44. Vlasenko N. A., Zaloilo M. V. The lawmaking school: from the development of legal technique to modern legal technologies. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2015, no. 5(54), pp. 734—745. (In Russ.) 
45. Khabrieva T. Y., Vlasenko N. A. (eds). Legal technique. Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.) 
46. Belov V. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika rossiyskogo nalogovogo zakonodatel’stva (obshcheteoreticheskiy analiz). Cand. diss. thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 2002. 
47. Kashanina T. V. Review of the book “Legal technique”. Journal of Russian Law, 2010, no. 3, pp. 171—173. (In Russ.) 
48. Kartashov V. N. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, taktika, strategiya i tekhnologiya (k voprosu o sootnoshenii). In: Baranov V. M. (ed.). Problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. 
49. Isaeva L. A. Yuridicheskie tekhnologii v deyatel’nosti ugolovno-ispolnitel’noy sistemy. Cand. diss. thesis. Vladimir, 2008. 
50. Kolesnik I. V. Problemy formirovaniya i realizatsii kontseptsii pravoprimenitel’noy tekhnologii v sovremennoy Rossii. Cand. diss. thesis. Rostov-on-Don, 2007.
51. Kolesnik I. V. Teoreticheskaya model’ pravoprimenitel’noy tekhnologii. Dr. diss. Nizhny Novgorod, 2015. 
52. Chervonyuk V. I. Yuridicheskie tekhnologii (“pravovaya inzheneriya”): metodologicheskoe znachenie, priroda, sootnoshenie s yuridicheskoy tekhnikoy, status v sisteme pravovedeniya. Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta, 2009, vol. 19, no. 4. 
53. Davydova M. L. Sravnitel’naya yuridicheskaya tekhnika: razmyshleniya o vozmozhnosti i neobkhodimosti sushchestvovaniya v kul’turnom prostranstve Rossii. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2016, no. 10. 
54. Ocheretyanyy K. A. Bytie v tsifre: modusy tsifrovogo sushchestvovaniya. Revolyutsiya i evolyutsiya: modeli razvitiya v nauke, kul’ture, obshchestve, 2019, no. 1. 
55. Mamychev A.Yu., Frolova E. E., Kim A. A. “Budushchee” kak attraktor sovremennykh politiko-pravovykh i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh transformatsiy: obzor osnovnykh problem i podkhodov. Advances in Law Studies, 2020, vol. 8. Special issue. 
56. Khabrieva T. Y. Technological Imperatives of the Modern World and the Role of Law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5—12. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jzsp.2023.001. 
57. Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_1_7. 
58. Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1. 
59. Khabrieva T. Y. Technological revolutions and their reflexion in law. Voprosy istorii, 2022, no. 2(2), pp. 256—270. (In Russ.) 
60. Shchennikova I. I. Yuridicheskie tekhnologii: upovat’, boyat’sya ili kooperirovat’sya. Zakonodatel’stvo, 2019, no. 2. 
61. Grishchenko G. A. Informatsionno-tekhnologicheskoe obespechenie zakonodatel’noy deyatel’nosti. In: Minbaleev A. V. (ed.). Informatsionno-tekhnologicheskoe obespechenie yuridicheskoy deyatel’nosti (LegalTech). Moscow, 2022. 
62. Chervonyuk V. I. Innovative legal technologies. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, 2021, no. 15, pp. 273—293. (In Russ.) 
63. Antonova E. G., Lavelina V. S. Tsifrovye tekhnologii v pravotvorcheskoy deyatel’nosti. Pravo i tsifrovaya ekonomika, 2020, no. 4. 
64. Pashentsev D. A., Alimova D. R. Novatsii pravotvorchestva v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obshchestvennykh otnosheniy. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2019, no. 6. 65. Golovkin R. B., Sokolova A. V. Inzhiniring v prave i inzhiniring prava. Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 2016, no. 3(40). 
66. Strukova P. E. Kitay ispol’zuet iskusstvennyy intellekt i algoritmy mashinnogo obucheniya. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika, 2020, vol. 12, iss. 4.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate