Correlation of the Concepts of a “Global Legal Order” and “Global International Order” in Conditions of World System Transformations
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Correlation of the Concepts of a “Global Legal Order” and “Global International Order” in Conditions of World System Transformations
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Boris Nefedov 
Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Research Professor, Department of International Relations, HSE University. ResearcherID: F-4874-2016
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow, Russia
Pages
130-143
Abstract

This study aims to examine the content and ratio between the fundamental concepts of “global legal order” and “global international order”, which are often perceived in doctrine as synonymous or closely related definitions (when scholars attribute specific qualitative global world order traits to the global legal order and vice versa), and at times mistakenly as terms denoting opposing phenomena. The resolution of this problem is closely linked to the process of transformation of the world system and, above all, its political segment. Since this process is in constant dynamics, the concept of the global world order is designed to reflect the state of the world system at a specific time, i.e. the global world order is constantly being transformed along with the world system. The global legal order has a different nature. It is formed as a result of the implementation of the fundamental, basic norms of jus cogens of general international law for this historical period, aimed at establishing the foundations for the legal settlement of the most important international interstate relations. The global legal order is also linked to the transformation of the global system. On the one hand, the transformations of the world system certainly have an impact on the state of the current global legal order, but they do not automatically entail its replacement: when its basic regulatory and legal foundations do not change their content, then the global legal order remains the same. On the other hand, the establishment of a new global legal order inevitably leads to a radical correction of the world system, and hence the global world order. The set of used methodological approaches encompass a range of general scientific and specialized methods, including historical analysis, formal logic, analysis and synthesis.

Keywords
world political system, world order, global legal order, transformation of the world political system, global international order
Date of publication
28.10.2024
Number of purchasers
1
Views
23
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Brzezinski Z. Second Chance: Three Presidents and the Crisis of American Superpower. New York, 2007. 240 p. 
2. Bull H. The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. 3rd ed. New Jersey, 2002. 368 p. 
3. Weston B. H. et al. International law and World Order: a problem-oriented coursebook. 4th ed. Eagan, 2006. 1512 p. 
4. Fukuyama F. State-Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. London, 2005. 137 p. 
5. Ikenberry J. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, 2001. 293 p. 
6. Mearsheimer J. J. Bound to Fail. The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order. International Security, 2019, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 7—50. 
7. Nye J. S. Will the Liberal Order Survive? The History of an Idea. Foreign Affairs, 2017, January — February, pp. 10—16. 
8. Winik J. 1944: FDR and the Year that changed History. New York, 2015. 639 p. 
9. Ayvazov A. E., Pantin V. I. From collision to partnership of civilizations: the New World order and the problem of UN reform. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2018, no. 1-2(27-28), pp. 88—108. (In Russ.) 
10. Artemov V. M. The Rule of law in modern Russian society: conceptual foundations and innovations. Moscow, 1998. 143 p. (In Russ.). 
11. Babosov E. M. Aggravation of the competition of models of the world order in the conditions of global instability of the XXI century. Chelovecheskiy kapital, 2012, no. 1(37), pp. 105—109. (In Russ.) 
12. Babosov E. M. Structural models of the world order in the XXI century. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya, 2011, no. 2, pp. 118—128. (In Russ.) 
13. Batalov E. Ya. World Development and World Order: An analysis of modern American Concepts. Moscow, 2005. 374 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Bogaturov A. D. The modern international order. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2003, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6—23. (In Russ.) 
15. Bogdanov A. N. The US foreign policy ideology and the modern world order. St. Petersburg, 2012. 194 p. (In Russ.) 
16. Bokachev I. A. Global and national in the conditions of the modern world order. Vlast’, 2010, no. 3, pp. 127—130. (In Russ.) 
17. Borisov A. Yu. The Yalta-Potsdam system as the basis of international stability. In: Yalta- Potsdam system of international relations 1945—2017. Afiny, 2017. Pp. 44—49. (In Russ.) 
18. Wallerstein I. The End of the World as We Know It. Social Science for the Twenty-First Century. Transl. from English. Moscow, 2003. 368 p. (In Russ.) 
19. Grinin L. E. World order in the past, present and future. Istoriya i sovremennost’, 2016, no. 1(23), pp. 20—63. (In Russ.) 
20. Grishaeva L. E. The UN Charter and the New World Order. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 92— 102. (In Russ.) 
21. Davydov A. S. Beijing, Washington, Moscow: Relationships in the context of the Transformation of global Architectonics. Moscow, 2015. 399 p. (In Russ.) 
22. Torkunov A. V., Narinsky M. M. (eds). History of International Relations. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2018. 399 p. (In Russ.) 
23. Kerimov A. D., Khalipova E. V. About State sovereignty and the coming world order. Rossiyskiy zhurnal pravovykh issledovaniy, 2018, vol. 5, no. 1(14), pp. 43—51. (In Russ.) 
24. Kissinger H. A. World order. Transl. from English. Moscow, 2015. 511 p. (In Russ.) 
25. Kozhevnikov S. N. General theory of law. 2nd ed. Nizhny Novgorod, 2010. 259 p. (In Russ.) 
26. Kortunov S. V. The formation of a new world order. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, 2002, no. 6, pp. 77—94. (In Russ.) 
27. Lebedeva M. M. The New World Order: parameters and possible contours. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2020, no. 4, pp. 24—35. (In Russ.) 
28. Shumilov V. M. (ed.). Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo pravoporyadka. Moscow, 2024. 
29. Movchan A. P. International law and order. Moscow, 1996. 101 p. (In Russ.) 
30. Neklessa A. I. Pax economicana: geo-economic system of the world order. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 1999, no. 1, pp. 71—89. (In Russ.) 
31. Nefedov B. I. The critique of the Westphalian peace Narrative. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2022, vol. 20, no. 3(70), pp. 6—27. (In Russ.) 
32. Nefedov B. I. The Concept of “World Order”: Theories and Reality. Sravnitel’naya politika, 2021, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 21—32. (In Russ.) 
33. Nefedov B. I. The concept of “rules” in the doctrine of “the world (international) order based on rules”. Rossiya i sovremennyy mir, 2021, no. 3, pp. 6—21. (In Russ.) 
34. Nikitin A. I. The Modern world order: its crisis and prospects. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2018, no. 6, pp. 32—46. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.06.03. 
35. Chernogor N. N. (ed.). The general doctrine of the legal order. The Rise of Law and Order. Moscow, 2019. 348 p. (In Russ.) 
36. Pantin V. I., Lapkin V. V. Transformations of political spaces in the conditions of transition to a polycentric world order. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2018, no. 6, pp. 47—66. (In Russ.) 
37. Panchenko M.Yu. The international order: the essence and mechanisms. Zhurnal nauchnykh publikatsiy aspirantov i doktorantov, 2008, no. 9, pp. 68—77. (In Russ.) 
38. Sadovaya E. S., Sautkina V. A. Transformation of the world order and conflict potential of modern societies. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2015, no. 11, pp. 103— 112. (In Russ.) 
39. Safranchuk I. A., Lukyanov F. A. The Modern world order: adaptation of actors to structural realities. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 2021, no. 4, pp. 14—25. (In Russ.) 
40. Sirota N. M. World Order. St. Petersburg, 2008. 158 p. (In Russ.) 
41. Solyanova M. V. The problem of world order in Modern Western studies. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2016, no. 5(50), pp. 34—47. (In Russ.) 
42. Sukharev Yu. A. Prospects of the modern “world order” in the context of global cultural transformations. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2018, no. 9 (801), pp. 386—402. (In Russ.) 
43. Tretyakova E. S. The Major Congresses and Conferences of the Nineteenth Century and Their Role in the Development of International Law. Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya, 2016, no. 1, pp. 41—47. (In Russ.) 
44. Khmelevskaya N. G. The dominants of the IMF reform in the context of the transformation of the global financial world order. Finansy i kredit, 2009, no. 27 (363), pp. 14—26. (In Russ.) 
45. Shershnyov I. L. The formation of a new world order in the era of globalization. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 2012, no. 635, pp. 139—149. (In Russ.) 
46. Yungblyud V. T. The World Order of 1945 is a process with an “open” continuation. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 2020, no. 13(4), pp. 52—79. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate