Везде
Information Rights and Their Limitations in the Context of Information Quality Transformation
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Information Rights and Their Limitations in the Context of Information Quality Transformation
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.61205/S160565900030161-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maryana Bakhsetovna 
Occupation: Dr. Sci. (Law), Assoc. Prof., Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, NCSA
Affiliation: North Caucasian State Academy, Cherkessk, Russia
Edition
Volume 28 Issue 11
Pages
124-137
Abstract

The urgency of the problem of the realization of information rights and freedoms of an individual in the context of changes in the quality of information is due to the increase in the turnover of low-quality and unreliable information. The purpose of the study is to reveal the essence of the identified problem and to study the specifics of the exercise of information rights and the nature of their restrictions in the context of ensuring the circulation of reliable, undistorted information. This necessitated an interdisciplinary approach and the formulation of the following tasks: 1) to consider the problems from the point of view of the causes, risks and consequences of mass unreliability, distortion of information; 2) to study the specifics of the implementation of information rights, including in terms of their competition with each other; 3) analyze the effect of the principle of reliability of information, the right to reliable information and other mechanisms to ensure the circulation of reliable information; 4) characterize the category of reliability of information. The methodological basis of the research was the principles of comprehensiveness, integrity, consistency and objectivity. The results of the study. In conditions of growing risks of changes in the quality of information, the main of which are overabundance, unreliability, distortion of information, satisfaction of information needs and requests largely depends on the effectiveness of legal means to ensure the circulation of reliable information. The main difficulty in their implementation is to ensure a balance between compliance with the principle of individual freedom in the field of information circulation and its restrictions in order to protect the interests of the individual, society, and the state. Based on the complexity of solving the problem only by legal methods, especially in the private sphere, it is necessary to supplement them with tools of socio-cultural influence. It is necessary to develop a category of reliable information, the formulation of which is proposed by the author. The main conclusion is that the assertion of reliability as the main attribute of information quality, and then as a universal value category, requires the development of a system of legal, socio-moral, information technology measures.

Keywords
information, information rights, information society, knowledge society, reliability of information, risks of inaccuracy, modification of information, fake, security from information, information product, right to delete information, ownership of information, official information
Date of publication
18.11.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
6
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 80.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Amelin R. V. Presumption of Information Reliability in State Information Systems. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, 2017, vol. 17, iss. 4, pp. 458—462. (In Russ.) 
2. Antopolskiy A. A. Human rights and Internet: case-law of the European Court of Human rights. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 159—185. (In Russ.) 
3. Boyarintseva O. A. Features of the legal nature of databases generated and used in the field of public and municipal administration. Administrativnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, 2016, no. 11, pp. 934—940. (In Russ.) 
4. Golovatskaya O. E. Methodological Approaches to the Study of Distorted Information. Kommunikologiya, 2023, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15—30. (In Russ.) 
5. Golushko T. K. Information immunity as a key concept of information and psychological security of individual. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 2022, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1483—1485. (In Russ.) 
6. Gorulev D. A. Economic security in a digital economy. Tekhniko-tekhnologicheskie problemy servisa, 2018, no. 1 (43), pp. 77—84. (In Russ.) 
7. Gritsenko L. M., Demidova T. A. The discrediting speech strategy in internet communication (on the example of the use of trolling). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2018, no. 55, pp. 29—42. (In Russ.) 
8. Eremin A. L. Nature and physiology of the informational human ecology. Ekologiya cheloveka, 2000, no. 2, pp. 55—60. (In Russ.) 
9. Zhuykov A. A., Mashchenko I. V. Transformation of the information quality as a systemic challenge to the post-industrial society of the 21st century. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series “Region Studies: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Sciences and Culturology”, 2020, no. 1(254), pp. 91—96. (In Russ.) 
10. Kartashkin V. A., Bykov I. P. Human rights and information extremism. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 580—589. (In Russ.) 
11. Kirillova N. M. Negative content in the information and telecommunication network of the Internet: problems of definition and classification. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 11. Law, 2018, no. 4, pp. 116—127. (In Russ.) 
12. Kukushkina O. V. Negative information: statement of fact or expression of opinion? Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy, 2016, no. 3(43). (In Russ.) 
13. Kulikova S. A. Misleading Information as a Type of Harmful Information: Analysis of Legal Nature and Systematization. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 2015, vol. 13, iss. 4(2), pp. 703—711. (In Russ.) 
14. Kushnir S. I., Kushnir M. S. Ethical aspects of information security. In: Murzina Zh. V. (ed). Topical issues of the humanities and social sciences: from theory to practice: mater. All- Russian scientific and practical conference with the International participation (Cheboksary, January 19, 2023). Cheboksary, 2023. Pp. 91—93. (In Russ.) 
15. Lopatinskaya T. D. Escapism in cyberspace as a life strategy. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya, 2020, no. 3(23), pp. 92—97. (In Russ.) 
16. Merzlyakov S. E. On question of the concept of information security. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Pravo, 2022, no. 4(36), pp. 175—180. (In Russ.) 
17. Murav’eva E. S. Some problems of ensuring information security at the international level. Voprosy rossiyskoy yustitsii, 2020, no. 7, pp. 534—540. (In Russ.) 
18. Nesterov A. V. Information products: legal aspect. Information law: actual problems of theory and practice: collection of reports of scientific and practical conference. Moscow, April 3, 2015. Moscow, 2015. 14 p. (In Russ.) 
19. Pashchenko I. Yu. Right to be forgotten: foreign and Russian experience of legal regulation. Nauka. Mysl’: elektronnyy periodicheskiy zhurnal, 2016, no. 4, pp. 189—192. (In Russ.) 
20. Petrovskaya O. V. Information unreliability as a threat to information security. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, 2022, no. 2(43), pp. 94—99. (In Russ.) 
21. Petrovskaya O. V. The principle of reliability in information law. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2022. 204 p. (In Russ.) 
22. Petrovskaya O. V. Digital transformation and the problems of ensuring the reliability of information. Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo, 2020, no. 3, pp. 130—132. (In Russ.) 
23. Podrabinok E. M. Features of the implementation of the right to leave in the epoch of digitalization of the society. Permskiy yuridicheskiy al’manakh, 2019, no. 2, pp. 290—300. (In Russ.) 
24. Pykhtina T. F. Verity as a social weight postmodernism’s ways in cognition theory). Vestnik NGUEU, 2012, no. 3, pp. 289—294. (In Russ.) 
25. Rerke V. I., Bubnova I. S., Demakov V. I. Information and psychological security as a scientific research definition. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie, 2022, iss. 5(45), pp. 202— 211. (In Russ.) 
26. Sapon I. V. Public and private on a social media profile through the lens of Sandra Petronio’s theory. Idei i idealy, 2021, vol. 13, no. 2, part 1, pp. 126—143. (In Russ.) 
27. Slesarev Yu. V., Losyakov A. V. C confidential information protection problems in web: legal aspect. Baltiyskiy gumanitarnyy zhurnal, 2018, vol. 7, no. 1(22), pp. 383—385. (In Russ.) 
28. Ustinov D. The essence of information security. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk, 2017, no. 12, pp. 146—151. (In Russ.) 
29. Fetisova T. A. Aggressive behavior in Internet communication. Vestnik kul’turologii, 2018, pp. 185—197. (In Russ.) 
30. Chistyakova O. V. Human in a mediatizing postmodern world: anthropological meanings and social implications. Chelovek. Obshchestvo. Inklyuziya, 2016, no. 2-1, pp. 90—98. (In Russ.) 
31. Shaptsev V. A. Human information ecology. Problem statement. Matematicheskie struktury i modelirovanie, 1999, no. 3, pp. 125—133. (In Russ.) 
32. Starovoytov V. G., Kuznetsov N. V., Kotova N. E., Lapenkova N. V. The problem of ensuring data quality in public administration information systems. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2019, no. 11, pp. 174—178. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate