Везде
Issues of the Efficiency of Judicial Reconciliation in the Russian Civil Process
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Issues of the Efficiency of Judicial Reconciliation in the Russian Civil Process
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.12737/jrp.2023.041
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Egor Trezubov 
ORCID: 0000-0003-2607-0405
Occupation: Associate Professor at the Department of Labor Law, Environmental Law and Civil Procedure
Affiliation: Kemerovo State University
Address: Kemerovo, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 4
Pages
59-71
Abstract

Given the extremely low efficiency of the institute of judicial mediation in Russia and the insignificant volume of cases in which the result of reconciliation was achieved, it is of scientific and practical interest to assess the effectiveness and determine the potential for intensifying the use of a new mediation procedure in the domestic civil process — judicial reconciliation.

The purpose of the study is to assess the effectiveness of legal regulation and organizational support of the judicial reconciliation procedure in the civil process.

Methods: a system-structural method by which judicial reconciliation and judicial mediation are considered as part of a single whole — mediation procedures, which determines the possibility of evaluating these institutions according to the same criteria; a formal legal method that allows an analysis of the sources of legal regulation of mediation and judicial reconciliation; a method of functional analysis that allowed an assessment the role of the mediator in the procedures under consideration and the conditions for the organizational support of the procedure.

It is proved that judicial reconciliation is a model of mediation procedure integrated into the judicial system and has significant advantages over judicial mediation, namely: the gratuitousness of reconciliation for the parties and the special status of a judicial mediator. The decision to involve only retired judges as judicial conciliators is supported. The identified organizational problems of insufficiency of the quantitative composition of judicial conciliators, their territorial remoteness from the venues of reconciliation, as well as the lack of a mechanism for proper budget financing make the procedure under consideration ineffective and are a significant obstacle to its intensification. It is suggested that the development of judicial reconciliation is possible only with due political will both on the part of the court considering the case and on the part of the state as a whole.

Keywords
mediation, judicial conciliation, mediation, effectiveness of the legal institution, alternative dispute resolution, remuneration and reimbursement of the expenses of the judicial mediator
Date of publication
21.04.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
259
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Abolonin V. O. Judicial Mediation: Theory, Practice, Prospects. Moscow, 2014. 408 p. (In Russ.)
2.	Balashova I. N. From negotiations to mediation: on search for an efficient dispute resolution model. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2022, no. 4, pp. 14—18. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2022-4-14-18.
3.	Borisova E. A. Judicial conciliation: who is guilty and what to do. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2019, no. 9, pp, 20—23. (In Russ.)
4.	Dolova M. O., Bagryanskaya P. D. Judicial Conciliation in Civil Cases. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 5, pp. 104—119. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2020.059.
5.	Endryus N. The three paths of justice. Court proceedings, arbitration, and mediation in England. Moscow; Berlin, 2012. 544 p. (In Russ.)
6.	Evtukhovich E. A., Fil’chenko D. G. Judicial Conciliation and Judicial Conciliator. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 265—293. (In Russ.) DOI 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-265-293.
7.	Gavrilov S. O., Gavrilova A. V. (eds). The History and Modern Trends in the Development of the Civil Society and the State (the Human Rights Aspect). Moscow, 2019. 432 p. (In Russ) DOI: 10/31085/9785392296811-2019-432.
8.	Ivanova E. A., Solomeina E. A., Sheremetova G. S. Conditions for the efficient development of mediation in Russia. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2022, no. 4, pp. 8—13. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2022-4-8-13.
9.	Kazikhanova S. S. On the nature of relationships for reconciliation and the desirability of their regulation in civil procedural codes. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 109—131. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-109-131.
10.	Kazikhanova S. S. Relations regulated by the norms contained in the civil procedural codes and the subject of civil procedural law. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2022, no. 2, pp. 118—127. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2022.135.2.118-127.
11.	Kotlyarova V. V. On prospects of the development of the institution of mediation. Mirovoy sud’ya, 2021, no. 12, pp. 19—22. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/2072-4152-2021-12-19-22.
12.	Kovach K. K. Mediation: a short course. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2013. 316 p. (In Russ.)
13.	Kurochkin S. A. Efficiency of civil litigation. Moscow, 2020. 358 p. (In Russ.)
14.	Kurochkin S. A. Litigation or alternative forms of dispute resolution: choice as the result of their economic efficiency analysis. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2011, no. 1(76), pp. 153—161. (In Russ.)
15.	Lazarev S. V. Fundamentals of Judicial Conciliation. Moscow, 2011. 256 p. (In Russ.)
16.	Mikhaylova E. V. The judicial conciliation procedure as a civil procedure relation. Rossiyskiy sud’ya, 2022, no. 5, pp. 3—8. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18572/1812-3791-2022-5-3-8.
17.	Nefedev E. A. Declination of the parties to peace in civil procedure. Kazan’, 1890. 92 p. (In Russ.)
18.	Reshetnikova I. V. Some trends in the development of conciliation procedures in the Russian procedure. In Fil’chenko D. G. (ed.). Judicial and non-judicial forms of protection of civil rights: a collection of articles dedicated to the anniversary of E. I. Nosyreva. Moscow, 2020. Pp. 267—271. (In Russ.)
19.	Reshetnikova I. V. Thinking about Litigation: Selected. Moscow, 2019. 510 p. (In Russ.)
20.	Samsonov N. V. The system of sources (forms) of civil procedural law of the Russian Federation. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2021. 622 p. (In Russ.)
21.	Terekhova L. A. On the System of Sources of Civil Procedural Law of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya “Pravo”, 2022, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 121—124. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24147/1990-5173.2022.19(2).121-124.
22.	Timofeev Yu. A. Judicial conciliation: problems and prospects. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess, 2021, no. 3, pp. 44—48. DOI: 10.18572/1812-383X-2021-3-44-48.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate