Везде
Business Corruption and Countering It in Organizations
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Business Corruption and Countering It in Organizations
Annotation
PII
S1605-65900000622-5-1
DOI
10.12737/jrp.2023.044
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yuri Truntsevsky 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8425-2533
Occupation: Head of the Department of Methodology of Combating Corruption
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 27 No. 4
Pages
98-106
Abstract

The problem of ensuring the anti-corruption stability of domestic business has long been discussed in the legal scientific environment and at the legislative level. The current system of norms defining the requirements for organizations to implement anti-corruption compliance is of a general nature and does not contain sufficient specific measures to combat corruption crime. An important issue in the development of standards of anti-corruption behavior of business structures in Russia is to encourage organizations to voluntarily introduce internal control mechanisms into their activities and corporate culture, which can significantly reduce the level of corruption within the company and in relation to their counterparties.

The conducted study of the state of anti-corruption offenses on the part of organizations, legislation establishing responsibility for illegal remuneration on behalf of a legal entity, made it possible to compile a typical (average) portrait of a domestic bribe-giving organization and propose a number of measures to form and strengthen the anti-corruption stability of domestic business. The conclusion is made about the need to mitigate administrative liability under art. 19.28 The Administrative Code of the Russian Federation in case the organization takes all measures to prevent corruption, as well as support small (medium) enterprises in developing their anti-corruption policies based on a digital platform (mobile application).

Keywords
corruption, organization, prevention, responsibility, compliance
Date of publication
21.04.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
151
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Cardona O. D., Aalst M. K. van, Birkmann J. etc. Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. Ed. by C. B. Field, V. Barros, T. F. Stocker et al. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge; New York, 2012. Pp. 65—108.
2.	Eminov V. E., Maksimov S. V. Organized Crime and Corruption: Russian Realities and Ways of Counteraction. Moscow, 2019. 96 p. (In Russ.)
3.	Freidman O. A., Smirnova I. G. The corruption component in transport and logistics services: a causal complex. Vserossiyskiy kriminologicheskiy zhurnal, 2018, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 669—677. (In Russ.)
4.	Kazakova V. A., Inshakov S. M. Prevention and suppression of corruption by civil legal measures. Nauchnyy portal MVD Rossii, 2019, no. 4(48), pp. 30—34. (In Russ.)
5.	Nomokonov V. A. Fight against corruption as a priority of anti-criminal policy. In Dolgova A. I. (ed.). Kriminologicheskaya situatsiya i reagirovanie na nee. Moscow, 2014. Pp. 169—176. (In Russ.)
6.	Schultz D., Harutyunyan K. Combating corruption: The development of whistleblowing laws in the United States, Europe, and Armenia. International Comparative Jurisprudence, 2015, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 87—97.
7.	Sharma S. K., Sengupta A., Panja S. C., Nandi T. Sorruption risk assessment methods: a review and future direction for organizations. ELKʼs International Journal of Finance, 2016, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1—44.
8.	Sharma S., Bhat A. Supply chain risks: Development of model and empirical evidence. International Journal of Applied Management Science, 2014. DOI: 10.1504/IJAMS.2014.059293.
9.	Shesler A. V., Shesler S. S. Pseudo-counteraction to corruption. Vestnik Sibirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii, 2020, no. 2(39), pp. 30—34. (In Russ.)
10.	Truntsevskij Yu. V., Karpovich O. G. Due diligence — legal audit of economic subjects. Bezopasnost’ biznesa, 2013, no. 4, pp. 22—25. (In Russ.)
11.	Truntsevsky Yu. V. Compliance of Organizations with the Requirements of Anti-Corruption Legislation: Practice Issues. Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 2, pp. 169—182. (In Russ.)
12.	Tsirin A. M. Convergence of Law and Ethics in Combating Corruption: Comparative Investigation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 41—48. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.063.
13.	Tsirin A. M., Cherepanova E. V., Matveev V. V. Constitutional Waymarks in Combating Corruption (Review of the Tenth Eurasian Anti-Corruption Forum). Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2021, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 125—143. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2021.059.
14.	Tsirin A. M., Matulis S. N., Matveev V. V. Combating Corruption as a National Priority in Practice, Science and Education. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 139—150. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.056.
15.	Witten R., Parker K., Holtmeier J., Koffer T. Prescriptions for Compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Identifying Bribery Risks and Implementing Anti-Bribery Controls in Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences Companies. Business Lawyer, 2009. Pp. 691—737.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate