On Legality of Restriction of the Right to Freedom for Probationers Evading the Control of Penal Enforcement Inspections
On Legality of Restriction of the Right to Freedom for Probationers Evading the Control of Penal Enforcement Inspections
References
Additional sources and materials
1. Cid J. Suspended sentences in Spain: Decarceration and recidivism. June 1, 2005. DOI: 10.1177/0264550505052686. 2. Euvrard E., Leclerc Ch. Pre-trial detention and guilty pleas: Inducement or coercion? Punishment and Society, 2016, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 525—542. DOI: 10.1177/1462474516670153. 3. Jacqueline G. Lee. To Detain or Not to Detain? Criminal Justice Policy Review, 2016, vol. 30, no. 1. DOI: 10.1177/0887403416668016. 4. Sacks M., Ackerman A. R. Bail and sentencing: Does Pretrial detention lead to a harsher sentence? Criminal Justice Policy Review, November 2012, vol. 25, no. 1. DOI: 10.1177/0887403412461501. 5. Tartaro C., Sedelmaier C. M. A tale of two counties: the impact of pretrial release, race, and ethnicity upon sentencing decisions. Criminal Justice Studies, 2009, vol. 22, iss. 2. 6. Akimova L. V. Aktual’nye problemy kontrolya za uslovno osuzhdennymi. Novyy yuridicheskiy vestnik, 2020, no. 10(24), pp. 52—54. 7. Borkov V. N., Bulatov B. B. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana svobody lichnosti podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i osuzhdennogo. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2021, no. 472, pp. 197—203. 8. Divaev A. B., Smirnov A. N. Sovershenstvovanie poryadka zaklyucheniya pod strazhu po osnovaniyam, ukazannym v p. 18 i 181 st. 397 UPK RF. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo instituta, 2019, no. 3(40), pp. 112—121. 9. Zhilyaev R. M. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie po ugolovnomu zakonodatel’stvu GDR. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal, 2020, no. 10-1(100), pp. 172—174. 10. Kononenko V. I. Analogiya v ugolovnom protsesse. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, 2018, no. 12. 11. Kuznetsov A. I., Ulitina U. A. Aktual’nye problemy, voznikayushchie pri osushchestvlenii kontrolya za uslovno osuzhdennymi. Vestnik Permskogo instituta FSIN Rossii, 2019, no. 1(32), pp. 27—32. 12. Lozhkina L. V. Zaderzhanie i zaklyuchenie pod strazhu osuzhdennykh, zlostno uklonyayushchikhsya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya v vide shtrafa, obyazatel’nykh rabot, ispravitel’nykh rabot i ogranicheniya svobody: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Ed. by L. G. Tat’yanina. Moscow, 2008. 192 p. 13. Lyadov E. V. Institut uslovnogo osuzhdeniya: ugolovno-pravovoy i ugolovnoispolnitel’nyy aspekty. Ryazan’, 2016. 14. Milich I. D. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie. Rol’ prava v obespechenii blagopoluchiya cheloveka: sbornik dokladov XI Moskovskoy yuridicheskoy nedeli. Part 4. 2022. 560 p. 15. Nikolyuk V. V. Vozmeshchenie osuzhdennomu vreda, prichinennogo nezakonnym soderzhaniem pod strazhey pri otmene uslovnogo osuzhdeniya. Ugolovnaya yustitsiya, 2018, no. 18. 16. Nikolyuk V. V. Obzor praktiki zaklyucheniya sudami pod strazhu (prodleniya sroka zaderzhaniya) osuzhdennykh, skryvshikhsya v tselyakh ukloneniya ot otbyvaniya nakazaniya (p. 18 st. 397 UPK RF). Rossiyskoe pravosudie, 2015, no. 7(111), pp. 61—81. 17. Nikolyuk V. V. Rasprostranyaetsya li institut mer presecheniya na stadiyu ispolneniya prigovora? Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo, 2015, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 43—52. 18. Nikolyuk V. V., Pupysheva L. A. “Zaochnoe” pravosudie v stadii ispolneniya prigovora: masshtaby, negativnye posledstviya, prichiny, mery ikh ustraneniya. In Ershov V. V. (ed. ). Obespechenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: materialy kruglogo stola (19 December 2017). Moscow, 2018. 264 p. 19. Nikolyuk V. Osobennosti rassmotreniya sudom voprosa o zaklyuchenii pod strazhu osuzhdennogo, uklonyayushchegosya ot pribytiya v koloniyu-poselenie. Ugolovnoe pravo, 2015, no. 4, pp. 106—111. 20. Ovsyannikov I. V. Ob obstoyatel’stvakh, neobkhodimykh dlya zaklyucheniya osuzhdennogo pod strazhu i napravleniya v koloniyu-poselenie pod konvoem. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 2021, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 107—111. 21. Ovsyannikov I. V. Uklonenie osuzhdennogo ot sledstviya ili suda kak uslovie zaklyucheniya ego pod strazhu i napravleniya v koloniyu-poselenie pod konvoem. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2022, no. 8, pp. 66—72. 22. Poltavets V. V. Institut uslovnogo osuzhdeniya v rukovodyashchikh nachalakh po ugolovnomu pravu RSFSR 1919 goda: kontseptual’nye osnovy i istoricheskoe znachenie. Yuridicheskiy vestnik Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2020, no. 1, pp. 63—67. 23. Lopashenko N. A. (ed. ). Sotsial’naya effektivnost’ uslovnogo osuzhdeniya v Rossii. Moscow, 2014. 24. Tarasov A. N. Uslovnoe osuzhdenie po zakonodatel’stvu Rossii: voprosy teorii i praktiki. St. Petersburg, 2004. 25. Toporov A. V., Burganov B. R. Application of the Analogy of the Law in Cases Arising from Administrative and Other Public Relations. Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 1, pp. 140— 146. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jrl. 2020. 010. 26. Shurukhnov N. G., Grishin D. A. Osobennosti realizatsii zaklyucheniya pod strazhu v otnoshenii osuzhdennykh (podozrevaemykh, obvinyaemykh), sovershivshikh prestupleniya v period otbyvaniya nakazaniya v vide lisheniya svobody. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie, 2017, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 118—123.
Comments
No posts found